ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2025
Computational new approach methods guide focused testing and enhance understanding of chlorantraniliprole toxicity across species.
Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EcoToxChip provides insights into pathway perturbation upon chlorantraniliprole exposure to larval fathead minnow.Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diamide insecticides, specifically chlorantraniliprole (CHL), have been rising in popularity over the past decade, becoming one of the most widely used insecticide classes globally. These insecticides target the ryanodine receptor (RyR), primarily for control of lepidopteran agricultural pests. Field studies have revealed that some lepidopteran species have developed mutations where a methionine in a particular position (e.g., I4790M) increases resistance to CHL. The toxicity data for CHL across species is limited, as is the case for many chemicals, which creates an opportunity to apply both traditional toxicity test methods and new approach methods (NAMs) to address data gaps. Here, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility (SeqAPASS) tool was used to query the RyR to generate susceptibility predictions for species exposed to CHL to fill those data gaps. These SeqAPASS results generated testable hypotheses that were used to guide focused acute aquatic toxicity studies using Daphnia magna, Daphnia pulex, Pimephales promelas, and Danio rerio. The fish species were not sensitive to CHL, whereas D. magna and D. pulex were found to be sensitive to CHL at environmentally relevant concentrations, despite having the methionine residue in the position of the I4790M resistance mutation. Additional SeqAPASS results showed that many other species, including beneficial pollinators and Lepidoptera, are predicted as likely susceptible to CHL. This study provided multiple lines of evidence toward the unlikelihood for the I4790M mutation to be the primary cause of resistance across species, filled knowledge gaps concerning CHL toxicity across species, and generated predictions of susceptibility for nontarget species that are not generally amenable to toxicity testing. This work presents a case example that demonstrates how NAMs can be used in combination with other types of data to direct targeted testing and build confidence in predictive approaches for their use in risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.