ReviewHepatic oncology2024
Integration of circulating tumor DNA in biliary tract cancer: the emerging landscape.
Review in Hepatic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07151118 (Role of Circulating Tumor DNA), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Role of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Genetic Profiling and Clinical Outcomes for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) Patients - Prospective, Observational, Epidemiology Study
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational and Implementation Barrier in the Management of Biliary Tract Cancer: Diagnostic, Molecular, Therapeutic, and Patient-Centered Challenges.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Redefining precision in biliary surgery: a paradigm shift from operative mastery to prognostic-driven strategy.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative genomic analysis of key oncogenic pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma among diverse populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in cholangiocarcinoma: current clinical applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine has emerged as a cornerstone in cancer treatment revolutionizing our approach across malignancies. Molecular profiling of biliary tract cancers (BTCs) has changed the treatment landscape positively by prolonging survival in an aggressively fatal malignancy in its advanced stages. The acquisition of tissue tumor DNA for genomic analysis in BTC is often anatomically challenging, limited by quantity and quality. In response, ctDNA has emerged as a noninvasive means of molecular profiling. The utility of both plasma and bile ctDNA has been explored in several studies demonstrating the high mutation detection rates and the ability to isolate targetable mutations when present. In addition, the concordance between plasma and tissue DNA provides validity in utilizing ctDNA results to infer treatment decisions. Analysis of ctDNA in BTC has also provided prognostic information and facilitated evaluation of clonal evolution with ease of serial measurements. Insight into novel mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies are being uncovered in ctDNA. As research endeavors continue to deepen our understanding in the field particularly in the space of ctDNA surveillance after curative intent, the tremendous progress made so far has enabled integration of ctDNA into the clinical practice of BTCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.