ReviewMolecular neurodegeneration2025
Molecular and cellular characteristics of cerebrovascular cell types and their contribution to neurodegenerative diseases.
Review in Molecular neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysfunction of the neurovascular unit as a temporal driver in Alzheimer's pathogenesis.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- An Acebuche Oil-Enriched Diet Prevents Early-Stage Cerebrovascular Alterations in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Bioengineering Stem Cell-Derived Glioblastoma Organoids: A Comprehensive Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Shed Syndecans (1-3), ELA-32, BDNF, NLR, and hs-CRP in Parkinson's Disease: Appropriate Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers When Combined in a Unique Panel.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many diseases and disorders of the nervous system suffer from a lack of adequate therapeutics to halt or slow disease progression, and to this day, no cure exists for any of the fatal neurodegenerative diseases. In part this is due to the incredible diversity of cell types that comprise the brain, knowledge gaps in understanding basic mechanisms of disease, as well as a lack of reliable strategies for delivering new therapeutic modalities to affected areas. With the advent of single cell genomics, it is now possible to interrogate the molecular characteristics of diverse cell populations and their alterations in diseased states. More recently, much attention has been devoted to cell populations that have historically been difficult to profile with bulk single cell technologies. In particular, cell types that comprise the cerebrovasculature have become increasingly better characterized in normal and neurodegenerative disease contexts. In this review, we describe the current understanding of cerebrovasculature structure, function, and cell type diversity and its role in the mechanisms underlying various neurodegenerative diseases. We focus on human and mouse cerebrovasculature studies and discuss both origins and consequences of cerebrovascular dysfunction, emphasizing known cell type-specific vulnerabilities in neuronal and cerebrovascular cell populations. Lastly, we highlight how novel insights into cerebrovascular biology have impacted the development of modern therapeutic approaches and discuss outstanding questions in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.