Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881321›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2025

Predictive role of the prognostic nutritional index for long-term prognosis among patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis.

Ying Liu, Keyu Li

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying LiuDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Keyu LiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. keyu_li@scu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify the predictive role of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for long-term survival in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

methodsThe PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CNKI databases were searched up to October 28, 2024. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup analyses by country, type of cancer and source of HR were performed.

resultsFifteen studies with 2106 patients were included. The pooled results demonstrated that a lower preoperative PNI was related to poorer OS (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.38-1.86, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.00-2.07, P = 0.051). Subgroup analysis stratified by country (China vs. non-China), type of cancer (pancreatic cancer vs. nonpancreatic cancer vs. mixed) and source of HR (univariate vs. multivariate analysis) revealed similar results.

conclusionOn the basis of the available evidence, the preoperative PNI might serve as a novel prognostic indicator in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, with a lower PNI predicting worse survival. However, more high-quality studies are needed to further verify the above findings.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyHumansNutritional StatusPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisDisease-free survivalMeta-analysisOverall survivalPancreatoduodenectomyPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID39881321
PMCPMC11776240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.