Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881201›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Randomized studies in China show that studying and promoting civic honesty needs to consider local norms.

Iris W Hung, Yuho Yiu, Sihan Wu, Dan Liu, Liman Wang, Xiao Han

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iris W HungDepartment of Marketing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China. irishung@cuhk.edu.cn.
Yuho Yiu *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China.
Sihan Wu *Department of Marketing, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Dan Liu *Department of Marketing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liman Wang *Department of Marketing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao HanHangzhou Fancha Technology, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen UDF01002194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Civic honesty is a crucial behavior that policymakers and business leaders strive to promote among citizens and employees. We conducted online and field experiments in China adapting the setting of a recent research which employed an innovative design to study civic honesty behavior around the globe. Results show that the psychological mechanism underlying lost-wallet reporting behavior in China is somewhat different from what has been suggested in the literature. Chinese participants indicated they are significantly more likely to put WeChat than email as contact information on their lost items, corroborating a local norm in China that email is infrequently used by ordinary Chinese citizens. Moreover, we tested multiple behavioral interventions in the field. Aiding a lost-property finder to connect to an owner using WeChat led to a reporting rate of 59.3% (vs. 7% as shown in a recent research that used email as the communication means; note that due to differences in experimental designs, no direct comparison of these reporting rates should be made however). Our research suggests that interacting with citizens from a targeted population to formulate locally informed research questions and design may be crucial for understanding and promoting civic honesty behavior.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorTrustChinaElectronic MailHumans

Identifiers

PMID39881201
PMCPMC11779863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.