ArticleScientific data2025
A Multidisciplinary Multimodal Aligned Dataset for Academic Data Processing.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic data processing is crucial in scientometrics and bibliometrics, such as research trending analysis and citation recommendation. Existing datasets in this domain have predominantly concentrated on textual data, overlooking the importance of visual elements. To bridge this gap, we introduce a multidisciplinary multimodal aligned dataset (MMAD) specifically designed for academic data processing. This dataset encompasses over 1.1 million peer-reviewed scholarly articles, enhanced with metadata and visuals that are aligned with the text. We assess the representativeness of MMAD by comparing its country/region distribution against benchmarks from SCImago. Furthermore, we propose an innovative quality validation method for MMAD, leveraging Language Model-based techniques. Utilizing carefully crafted prompts, this approach enhances multimodal processing capabilities to evaluate the accuracy of text-to-visual alignments. We also outline prospective applications for MMAD, providing the way for novel research endeavors, including automated caption generation and analysis of trends in figures. Thus, this work signals new research prospects and provides a fertile ground for advances in academic data processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.