Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881116›Full record

SynthesisClinical child and family psychology review2025

Motivations for Self-Harm in Young People and Their Correlates: A Systematic Review.

S Tang, A Hoye, A Slade, B Tang, G Holmes, H Fujimoto, W-Y Zheng, S Ravindra, H Christensen, A L Calear

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Exploring Support Preferences for Young Women Who Self-Harm: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S TangBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. samantha.tang@blackdog.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-5178-3816
A HoyeCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
A SladeBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
B TangBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
G HolmesBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
H FujimotoBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
W-Y ZhengBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
S RavindraBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
H ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
A L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-725X

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1155614National Health and Medical Research Council 1173146National Health and Medical Research Council 1200195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-harm in young people is associated with increased risk of suicide and other negative long-term outcomes. Understanding the motivations driving self-harm behaviours among young people can help to inform the development of preventative and treatment interventions. Self-harm rates have been rising, but reviews of the recent quantitative literature have not been undertaken. PsycInfo, Embase and Medline were systematically searched in September 2024 for studies published in the past ten years. Quantitative studies that examined motivations for self-harm (including prevalence and/or correlates) among young people (aged 10 to 24 years) with a history of self-harm were included in the review. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023429568). One hundred and seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Intrapersonal motivations for self-harm (particularly emotion regulation, anti-dissociation and self-punishment) were more common than interpersonal motivations (e.g. peer bonding, communication). Intrapersonal motivations correlated with female gender, higher self-harm severity, current, repetitive and persistent self-harm, suicidality, poorer mental health and poorer emotion regulation. There was evidence to suggest that interpersonal motives are associated with younger age and some mental health difficulties (e.g. anxiety). Young people predominantly self-harm for intrapersonal reasons. Given that self-harm for intrapersonal reasons is associated with greater self-harm severity, suicidality and poor mental health, steps should be taken to prevent and reduce self-harm. Interventions for self-harm require a multifaceted approach that not only provides young people with alternate ways of regulating their emotions, but also targets risk factors that contribute to self-harm.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationInterpersonal RelationsMotivationSelf-Injurious BehaviorAdolescentChildFemaleHumansYoung AdultMotivationsNon-suicidal self-injurySelf-harmYoung people

Identifiers

PMID39881116
PMCPMC11885408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.