Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881111›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

MRI-based deep learning radiomics to differentiate dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma from HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study.

Qian Wu, Tao Zhang, Fan Xu, Lixiu Cao, Wenhao Gu, Wenjing Zhu, Yanfen Fan, Ximing Wang, Chunhong Hu, Yixing Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qian Wu *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Tao Zhang *Department of Radiology, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Fan Xu *Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lixiu CaoDepartment of Nuclear Medical Imaging, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China.
Wenhao GuThe First People's Hospital of Taicang, Taicang, China.
Wenjing ZhuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Nantong Hospital 3 of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yanfen FanDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Ximing WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chunhong HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. sdhuchunhong@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6343-758X
Yixing YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China. yuyixing@163.com.

Funding

Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline Cultivation Unit JSDW202242Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province 2024M752334Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau Project SKY2023146Suzhou Science and Technology Bureau Project SSD2024083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate radiomics and deep learning models based on contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) for differentiating dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma (DPHCC) from HCC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

methodsOur study consisted of 381 patients from four centers with 138 HCCs, 122 DPHCCs, and 121 ICCs (244 for training and 62 for internal tests, centers 1 and 2; 75 for external tests, centers 3 and 4). Radiomics, deep transfer learning (DTL), and fusion models based on CE-MRI were established for differential diagnosis, respectively, and their diagnostic performances were compared using the confusion matrix and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).

resultsThe radiomics model demonstrated competent diagnostic performance, with a macro-AUC exceeding 0.9, and both accuracy and F1-score above 0.75 in the internal and external validation sets. Notably, the vgg19-combined model outperformed the radiomics and other DTL models. The fusion model based on vgg19 further improved diagnostic performance, achieving a macro-AUC of 0.990 (95% CI: 0.965-1.000), an accuracy of 0.935, and an F1-score of 0.937 in the internal test set. In the external test set, it similarly performed well, with a macro-AUC of 0.988 (95% CI: 0.964-1.000), accuracy of 0.875, and an F1-score of 0.885.

conclusionsBoth the radiomics and the DTL models were able to differentiate DPHCC from HCC and ICC before surgery. The fusion models showed better diagnostic accuracy, which has important value in clinical application. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: MRI-based deep learning radiomics were able to differentiate DPHCC from HCC and ICC preoperatively, aiding clinicians in the identification and targeted treatment of these malignant hepatic tumors. KEY POINTS: Fusion models may yield an incremental value over radiomics models in differential diagnosis. Radiomics and deep learning effectively differentiate the three types of malignant hepatic tumors. The fusion models may enhance clinical decision-making for malignant hepatic tumors.

Indexed as

Deep learningDifferential diagnosisLiver cancerMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39881111
PMCPMC11780023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.