ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Response to initial treatment with glucocorticoids in TAFRO syndrome and implications for secondary treatment.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct interleukin-6 production in IPL and TAFRO subtypes of idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.Haematologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of various initial treatments incorporating glucocorticoid (GC) in TAFRO syndrome (thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly). Cases of TAFRO syndrome up to November 2023 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) and resistance to GC therapy were assessed, with resistance analyzed based on the time to the next treatment or death (TTNTD). The study included 95 patients, including 5 diagnosed at our hospital. OS did not differ significantly between patients who received GC monotherapy and those who had a second-line therapy added within 2 weeks (100-day OS rate: 86.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.338). Moreover, 100-day OS did not differ between patients who received GC pulse therapy within 2 weeks and those who did not (77.5% vs. 93.1%, p = 0.129). In multivariate analyses, pretreatment severity score ≥ 8 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-8.50) and platelets ≥ 6.9 × 10^4/µL (HR, 2.26; 95% CI 1.01-5.02) were significantly associated with shorter TTNTD. Additional second-line or GC pulse therapy provided no advantage in the hyperacute phase. Higher severity scores and platelet values may predict resistance to GC therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39881107What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.