ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025
Assessing plastic ingestion in the White stork (Ciconia ciconia) through regurgitated pellets.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pollution is one of the main factors that threaten biodiversity nowadays. Plastic waste is a global problem which impacts not only on the marine environment but also on the terrestrial one. Great amounts of this kind of refuse are compiled in landfills, where lots of avian species feed. In contrast to seabirds research, there are limited studies that have considered how plastic is being ingested by land birds even when they are being affected both physically and at an endocrine level. We tried to assess the number of plastics and microplastics ingested by individuals of a White stork (Ciconia ciconia) colony in central Spain by collecting regurgitated pellets. The chemical composition of the elements was determined, as well as the relation between the amount of ingested plastic by individuals and their use of a landfill. Our results show that 3.44% of the pellet was formed by plastic (n = 50). Polyethylene, polystyrene, polypropylene and PET were the most abundant polymers, all of them being potentially problematic to the organism according to the literature. Each polymer was identified by Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR). We observed that the total amount of ingested plastics was stable along the use of the landfill, meaning White storks obtained plastic not only from anthropogenic sources but also from natural areas, indicating its high rate of pollution. Our study remarks the importance of addressing plastic ingestion in White storks as well as other terrestrial species, not only to understand the possible damage to the population but also to the whole ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.