Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881086›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Effect of postoperative peripheral nerve blocks on the analgesia nociception index under propofol anesthesia: an observational study.

Motoi Kumagai, Naoto Yamada, Masahiro Wakimoto, Shohei Ogawa, Sho Watanabe, Kotaro Sato, Kenji S Suzuki

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Motoi KumagaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan. bear@kxd.biglobe.ne.jp.
Naoto YamadaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan.
Masahiro WakimotoDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan.
Shohei OgawaDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan.
Sho WatanabeDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan.
Kotaro SatoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba-cho, Japan.
Kenji S SuzukiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University Hospital, 2-1-1 Idai-dori, Yahaba-cho, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe analgesia nociception index (ANI), also referred to as the high frequency variability index (HFVI), is reported to be an objective measure of nociception. This study investigated changes in ANI after peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) under general anesthesia. Understanding these changes could enhance assessment of PNB efficacy before emergence from general anesthesia.

methodsThis study enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective upper limb surgery. After surgery, median and maximum ANI values were recorded during two periods: a 5-minute period before PNB and a 20-minute period after PNB. The numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain was assessed twice: immediately after emergence from general anesthesia (N1) and the maximum pain experienced by the following morning after PNB effects subsided (N2). The difference in ANI before and after PNB was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

resultsThe ANI significantly increased after PNB in both the median (pre vs. post PNB value: 53.5 [44.0-68.0] vs. 59.0 [47.0-78.3], median [interquartile range]; P < 0.05) and maximum values (64.0 [56.3-79.5] vs. 74.5 [61.5-85.3]; P < 0.01). Secondary analysis revealed that significant ANI increases in both median (48.0 [42.3-66.5] vs. 61.0 [50.0-76.5]; P < 0.01) and maximum values (58.5 [50.3-75.3] vs. 76.0 [71.8-83.5]; P < 0.01) in the 18 cases with N2 ≥ 4 whereas no statistical differences were observed in the 12 cases with N2 < 4.

conclusionThe increased ANI value after PNB under propofol anesthesia may be a valuable indicator for assessing PNB efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000050334. DATE OF REGISTRATION: February 28, 2023.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaNerve BlockNociceptionPeripheral NervesPropofolAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodUpper ExtremityPropofolAnalgesia nociception indexHigh-frequency variability indexNumeric rating scalePeripheral nerve blocks

Identifiers

PMID39881086
PMCPMC12474647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.