Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881085›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2025

Accuracy of remote, video-based supraventricular tachycardia detection in patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion: a prospective cohort.

Iris Cramer, Rik van Esch, Cindy Verstappen, Carla Kloeze, Bas van Bussel, Sander Stuijk, Jan Bergmans, Marcel van 't Veer, Svitlana Zinger, Leon Montenij and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Iris CramerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. I.c.cramer@tue.nl.ORCID 0009-0006-9781-8475
Rik van EschDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Cindy VerstappenDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Carla KloezeDepartment of Medical Physics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Bas van BusselDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sander StuijkDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Jan BergmansDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marcel van 't VeerDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Svitlana ZingerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Leon MontenijDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
R Arthur BouwmanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Lukas DekkerDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Groene Loper 3, 5612 AZ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

NWO, ZonMW, hartstichting, DCVA IMDI104021003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unobtrusive pulse rate monitoring by continuous video recording, based on remote photoplethysmography (rPPG), might enable early detection of perioperative arrhythmias in general ward patients. However, the accuracy of an rPPG-based machine learning model to monitor the pulse rate during sinus rhythm and arrhythmias is unknown. We conducted a prospective, observational diagnostic study in a cohort with a high prevalence of arrhythmias (patients undergoing elective electrical cardioversion). Pulse rate was assessed with rPPG via a visible light camera and ECG as reference, before and after cardioversion. A cardiologist categorized ECGs into normal sinus rhythm or arrhythmias requiring further investigation. A supervised machine learning model (support vector machine with Gaussian kernel) was trained using rPPG signal features from 60-s intervals and validated via leave-one-subject-out. Pulse rate measurement performance was evaluated with Bland-Altman analysis. Of 72 patients screened, 51 patients were included in the analyses, including 444 60-s intervals with normal sinus rhythm and 1130 60-s intervals of clinically relevant arrhythmias. The model showed robust discrimination (AUC 0.95 [0.93-0.96]) and good calibration. For pulse rate measurement, the bias and limits of agreement for sinus rhythm were 1.21 [- 8.60 to 11.02], while for arrhythmia, they were - 7.45 [- 35.75 to 20.86]. The machine learning model accurately identified sinus rhythm and arrhythmias using rPPG in real-world conditions. Heart rate underestimation during arrhythmias highlights the need for optimization.

Indexed as

Electric CountershockTachycardia, SupraventricularVideo RecordingAgedAlgorithmsCohort StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart RateHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedMonitoring, PhysiologicPhotoplethysmographyProspective StudiesPhysiologic monitoringRemote photoplethysmographySupraventricular tachycardiaVideo-camera

Identifiers

PMID39881085
PMCPMC12474667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.