Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39881071›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2025

Acute appendicitis and its treatment: a historical overview.

Lucio Selvaggi, Francesco Pata, Gianluca Pellino, Mauro Podda, Salomone Di Saverio, Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca, Pasquale Sperlongano, Francesco Selvaggi, Bruno Nardo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07128758 (The Effect of Music Listening on the Initial Mobility Level of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Appendectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07128758 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Music Listening on the Initial Mobility Level of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAkdeniz UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled68ConditionsAppendectomy, Child, Mobility, MobilizationArmsMusic Group Implementation Before surgery, children were asked whether they enjoyed listening to music and what styles of music they liked.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucio Selvaggi *Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco Pata *Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy. francesco.pata@unical.it.
Gianluca PellinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Mauro PoddaDepartment of Surgical Science, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Salomone Di SaverioDepartment of Surgery, "Madonna del Soccorso" Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy.
Giuseppe Massimiliano De LucaUnit of Endocrine, Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University Medical School "A. Moro" of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Pasquale SperlonganoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Francesco SelvaggiDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Bruno NardoDepartment of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcute appendicitis (AA) is the leading cause of acute abdomen worldwide, with an incidence of 90-100 cases per 100,000 individuals annually and a lifetime risk of 7-12%. Despite its prevalence, historical accounts of AA are limited, particularly when compared to conditions like haemorrhoids, likely due to the appendix's internal location. This article traces the historical evolution of AA treatment from ancient times to the present, highlighting key contributions.

methodsA review of common research databases and relevant literature on AA was conducted.

resultsEvidence from ancient Egypt suggests early recognition of the appendix, referring to it as the "worm of the bowel." However, detailed anatomical descriptions and treatment approaches for AA did not emerge until the Renaissance, particularly with contributions from Leonardo da Vinci and Berengario da Carpi. The article traces the progression of AA management, including the first autopsies and surgeries, the development of surgical techniques predating anaesthesia and antisepsis, and advancements achieved from the nineteenth to the twenty-first century. The shift from conservative to surgical approaches is discussed, alongside innovations such as laparoscopic appendicectomy, single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AA treatment, including adaptations in medical practices, is also explored.

conclusionsThis review highlights the significant historical developments in AA treatment and its pivotal role in advancing abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisAcute DiseaseHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 18th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHistory, AncientHistory, MedievalHumansLaparoscopyAcute appendicitisAppendectomyAppendicectomyERATHistorical overviewHistoryHistory of medicineLaparoscopicLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID39881071
PMCPMC11779765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.