ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2025
Leveraging Model-Based Simulations to Optimize Extended Dosing of Leuprolide 6-Month Intramuscular Depot Formulation.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems: The Future Direction for the Treatment of Tumors.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveA gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist such as leuprolide is widely used to achieve sustained suppression of testosterone levels, which play a critical role in the treatment of prostate cancer. Recent advances in drug delivery systems have led to the development of long-acting depot formulations, such as the 6-month intramuscular (IM) leuprolide formulation, which aim to simplify dosing and improve convenience for both patients and healthcare providers. Exploring extended dosing intervals for such formulations represents a promising approach to further optimize treatment regimens, potentially balancing efficacy with patient-centered care. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of various extended dosing regimens of the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation for prostate cancer treatment. The primary objective was to assess whether extended dosing intervals could maintain testosterone concentrations below the castrate threshold of < 0.5 ng/ml and < 0.2 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects, as outlined in regulatory criteria.
methodsThe study utilized a previously published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to simulate the testosterone suppression profiles for different extended dosing regimens, including every 6 months (Q6M), 7 months (Q7M), 8 months (Q8M), 9 months (Q9M), 10 months (Q10M), 11 months (Q11M), and 12 months (Q12M). The simulations were carried out with 1000 virtual subjects. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to account for variability in baseline testosterone levels and fraction of drug absorbed.
resultsThe simulation results indicated that extending the dosing interval from Q6M to Q8M could ensure that over 90% of subjects maintain testosterone concentrations below 0.2 ng/ml. Similarly, extending the dosing interval to Q9M would keep testosterone concentrations below 0.5 ng/ml in over 90% of subjects. The sensitivity analyses confirmed that these extended dosing regimens consistently achieved and maintained target testosterone levels across various scenarios.
conclusionThe findings support the feasibility of extending the dosing intervals for the leuprolide 6-month IM depot formulation beyond the label-recommended 6 months. Specifically, the Q8M and Q9M regimens emerged as viable candidates for further clinical evaluation, offering potential benefits in reducing injection frequency while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Further clinical studies are necessary to confirm the long-term efficacy of these extended dosing regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39881064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.