ReviewDiscover oncology2025
The hype around ctDNA guiding an informed perioperative therapeutic strategy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Specific PET Imaging for Precision Management of Lung Cancer: Advances, Clinical Translation and Future Directions.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Evolving non-invasive biomarkers in NSCLC immunotherapy: integrating liquid biopsy and multi-omics profiling for precision oncology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer immunotherapy: prognostic marker today, predictive tool tomorrow?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Biomarker analysis of circulating tumor DNA in clinical stage III melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- The prospects and limitations of liquid biopsy utilization for clinical practice in Taiwan.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a dire disease being the first cause of cancer death among both genders. Early-stage NSCLC often has better treatment outcomes despite it being a highly heterogeneous disease. So far, the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy strategies have led to a small benefit with an improvement of 5% in overall survival as an absolute benefit. Recently, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has shown robust efficacy in terms of event-free survival and overall survival. Thus, these combinations are today considered a new standard of care in early-stage NSCLC. The application of these strategies to all-comer population lead to confounding definitive results regarding the efficacy and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed balancing the promise of healing than toxicities. At present, the clinical staging TNM system guides the clinical choice, however it is not entirely sufficient. Circulant tumoral DNA (ctDNA) emerged as a promising prognostic and predictive biomarker that may guide the future perioperative strategy and pave the way to personalized medicine also in this exciting field. This narrative review aims to put in the context the employment of ctDNA, give some perspective and suggestions weighing the pros and cons of this technique for our tomorrow clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.