ArticleAIDS and behavior2025
Implementation Determinants of PrEP and Behavioral Health Treatment Referral among HIV Test Counselors.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), an effective biomedical prevention intervention, is not sufficiently reaching populations experiencing high HIV incidence. Behavioral health (BH) treatment addressing mental health and substance use similarly requires increased reach to HIV-affected populations. HIV testing is an opportunity to refer individuals to PrEP and BH treatment. This study, conducted in Miami-Dade County, FL, a domestic HIV epicenter, aimed to assess (1) self-reported rates at which HIV test counselors refer clients to PrEP and BH treatment, (2) barriers and facilitators to PrEP and BH treatment referral, and (3) the relationship between barriers and facilitators and test counselors' referral rates. Among 127 HIV test counselors, the average PrEP referral rate was 63.8% (SD = 41.5) of those potentially meeting PrEP indications. Insufficient time was associated with lower PrEP referral (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.42-0.99, p = 0.023) and training in PrEP screening was associated with higher rates of PrEP referral (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.98-1.64, p = 0.034). The average BH treatment referral rate was 52.7% (SD = 44.4) of clients who the counselor felt would potentially benefit from treatment. Counselors lacking knowledge of screening (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2-0.78, p = 0.004), referral procedures (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23-0.87, p = 0.008), or locations to refer clients (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.86, p = 0.008), as well as those with higher caseloads (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.997-0.999, p < 0.001) were less likely to refer for BH. Training in substance use screening (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.96-1.64, p = 0.046) and referral (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.99-1.66, p = 0.029) were associated with increased BH referral. Implementation strategies are needed to address key barriers to PrEP and BH referrals in HIV testing contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.