ArticleArchives of virology2025
Systemic infection of cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus in Passiflora spp. occurs at the initial stage regardless of the species' resistance.
Article in Archives of virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Passion fruit woodiness disease (PWD), caused by cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus (CABMV), severely damages leaves and fruits, compromising passion fruit production. The dynamics of this infection in Passiflora spp. are still poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine the systemic infection time of CABMV in Passiflora spp. and to quantify the viral titer throughout the infection. Plants of Passiflora edulis Sims. (BGP418, susceptible), P. cincinnata Mast. (BGP243, moderately resistant), P. setacea DC. (BRS Pérola do Cerrado, resistant), and P. suberosa L. (BGP152, resistant) were used. The study was conducted in a climate chamber, and mechanical inoculations were carried out on the first pair of basal leaves of the seedlings. Symptoms were assessed using a scale whose scores were converted into a disease index (DI%), and the viral titer was determined at different time points by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). The first symptoms of the virus were observed at seven days after inoculation (Dai) in P. edulis (DI = 5.15%) and at 10 Dai in P. cincinnata (DI = 8.86%). On the other hand, P. setacea and P. suberosa did not show typical symptoms of the disease (DI = 0.00%). Systemic CABMV infection was detected at 30 minutes after inoculation regardless of the level of resistance of the Passiflora species. There was an increase in viral titer with infection time with P. edulis and P. cincinnata, although in the case of P. edulis, the increase in CABMV titer occurred earlier, at 2 Dai, and in P. cincinnata at 8 Dai. In the asymptomatic species (P. setacea and P. suberosa), there was no variation in the viral titer over the time periods evaluated. This pioneering study provides information for the selection of time intervals for future molecular research into the interaction between Passiflora spp. and CABMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39881014What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.