Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880969›Full record

Trial reportArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

The effect of pregnancy vitamin D supplementation on maternal blood pressure: real-world data analysis within the MAVIDOS randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Natasha L Citeroni-Clark, Stefania D'Angelo, Sarah R Crozier, Alexandra Kermack, Keith M Godfrey, Cyrus Cooper, Nicholas C Harvey, Rebecca J Moon

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Pregnancy vitamin D supplementation and bone mineral density of the mother: a post hoc analysis of the MAVIDOS randomised placebo-controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natasha L Citeroni-ClarkMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Stefania D'AngeloMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Sarah R CrozierMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Alexandra KermackDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, Coxford Road, Southampton, SO16 5YA, UK.
Keith M GodfreyMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Cyrus CooperMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Nicholas C Harvey *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Rebecca J Moon *MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. rm@mrc.soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-2284

Funding

Alzheimer's Research UK ARUK-PG2022A-008Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 289346Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 613977Medical Research Council MC_PC_21001Medical Research Council MC_PC_21003Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1015Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/2National Institute for Health and Care Research NF-SI-0515-10042Versus Arthritis 17702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeObservational studies have suggested negative associations between maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) status and risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and preeclampsia (PET)]. Data from intervention studies are limited. We hypothesised that vitamin D supplementation would lower maternal blood pressure (BP) during pregnancy and reduce the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

methodsThe Maternal Vitamin D Osteoporosis Study (MAVIDOS) was a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Pregnant women with a baseline 25(OH)D of 25-100 nmol/l were randomized to either 1000 IU/day cholecalciferol or placebo from 14 to 17 weeks' gestation until delivery. BP recordings documented during routine clinical pregnancy care were obtained from clinical records and grouped into gestational windows based on the schedule for routine antenatal care in the United Kingdom (23

resultsData for 734 women (366 cholecalciferol, 368 placebo) were included. Maternal mean systolic and diastolic BP did not differ between the randomization groups at any of the gestations studied. The incidences of PIH (placebo 1.6%, cholecalciferol 3.6%, p = 0.10) and PET (placebo 3.3%, cholecalciferol 3.8%, p = 0.68) were similar between the two groups.

conclusionsGestational vitamin D supplementation with 1000 IU/day from 14 to 17 weeks gestation did not lower maternal BP or reduce the incidences of PIH or PET in this trial.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCholecalciferolDietary SupplementsHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaVitamin DVitaminsAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyVitamin D Deficiency25-hydroxyvitamin DCholecalciferolVitamin DVitaminsCholecalciferolHypertensive disorders of pregnancyPreeclampsiaPregnancy-induced hypertension

Identifiers

PMID39880969
PMCPMC11985589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.