Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880901›Full record

Trial reportMolecular psychiatry2025

Neural signatures of risk-taking adaptions across health, bipolar disorder, and lithium treatment.

Jacqueline Scholl, Priyanka Panchal, Natalie Nelissen, Lauren Z Atkinson, Nils Kolling, Kate Ea Saunders, John Geddes, Matthew Fs Rushworth, Anna C Nobre, Paul J Harrison and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. At 75 Years, Is Lithium the Gold Standard in Bipolar Disorder?Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Neural and Behavioral Markers of Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Psychosis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacqueline SchollUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, Inserm, Lyon Neuroscience Research Centre U1028 UMR 5292, PsyR2 team, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France. Jacqueline.scholl@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9969-1355
Priyanka PanchalDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Natalie NelissenDWP Digital, Leeds, UK.
Lauren Z AtkinsonOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5549-8721
Nils KollingUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Inserm, Stem Cell and Brain Research Institute U1208, Bron, France.
Kate Ea SaundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
John GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Matthew Fs RushworthDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anna C NobreOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity (OHBA), Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN), Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Paul J HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-1126
Catherine J HarmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Catherine.harmer@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-8335

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/V004999/1RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/N014448/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 102,616/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying bipolar disorder (BD) and its treatment are still poorly understood. Here we examined the role of adaptations in risk-taking using a reward-guided decision-making task. We recruited volunteers with high (n = 40) scores on the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, MDQ, suspected of high risk for bipolar disorder and those with low-risk scores (n = 37). We also recruited patients diagnosed with BD who were assigned (randomized, double-blind) to six weeks of lithium (n = 19) or placebo (n = 16) after a two-week baseline period (n = 22 for FMRI). Participants completed mood ratings daily over 50 (MDQ study) or 42 (BD study) days, as well as a risky decision-making task and functional magnetic resonance imaging. The task measured adaptation of risk taking to past outcomes (increased risk aversion after a previous win vs. loss, 'outcome history'). While the low MDQ group was risk averse after a win, this was less evident in the high MDQ group and least so in the patients with BD. During fMRI, 'outcome history' was linked to medial frontal pole activation at the time of the decision and this activation was reduced in the high risk MDQ vs. the low risk MDQ group. While lithium did not reverse the pattern of BD in the task, nor changed clinical symptoms of mania or depression, it changed reward processing in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Participants' modulation of risk-taking in response to reward outcomes was reduced as a function of risk for BD and diagnosed BD. These results provide a model for how reward may prime escalation of risk-related behaviours in bipolar disorder and how mood stabilising treatments may work.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderRisk-TakingAdultAffectAntimanic AgentsBrainDecision MakingDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLithiumLithium CompoundsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexAntimanic AgentsLithiumLithium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID39880901
PMCPMC12185344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.