ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factors associated with higher WHO grade in meningiomas: a multicentric study of 552 skull base meningiomas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The histological grade is crucial for therapeutic management, and its reliable preoperative detection can significantly influence treatment approach. Lacking established risk factors, this study identifies preoperative predictors of high-grade skull base meningiomas and discusses the implications of non-invasive detection. A multicentric study was conducted on 552 patients with skull base meningiomas who underwent primary surgical resection between 2014 and 2019. Data were gathered from clinical, surgical and pathology records and radiological diagnostics. The predictive factors of higher WHO grade were analysed in univariate analysis and multivariate stepwise selection logistic regression analysis. Histological analysis revealed 511 grade 1 (92.6%) and 41 grade 2 (7.4%) meningiomas. A prognostic model predicting the probability of WHO grade 2 skull base meningioma (AUC 0.79; SE 0.04; 95% Wald Confidence Limits (0.71; 0.86)) based on meningioma diameter, presence of an arachnoid plane and cranial nerve palsy was built. Accurate preoperative detection of WHO grade in skull base meningiomas is essential for effective treatment planning. Our logistic regression model, based on diameter, cranial nerve palsy, and arachnoid plane, is tailored for detecting WHO grade 2 skull base meningiomas, even in outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.