Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880887›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mitochondrial dysfunction-driven AMPK-p53 axis activation underpins the anti-hepatocellular carcinoma effects of sulfane sulfur.

Xue Zheng, Yuhua Luo, Rui Huo, Yiwen Wang, Youbang Chen, Mianrong Chen, Qi Zhao, Kexin Li, Hanyi Zhang, Xiaotong Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xue ZhengGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Yuhua LuoGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Rui HuoGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Yiwen WangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Youbang ChenGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Mianrong ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511447, China.
Qi ZhaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lecong Hospital, Foshan, 528315, China.
Kexin LiGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Hanyi ZhangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Xiaotong LiGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Xiang LiGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Hui ZhangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
Zaopeng HeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Lecong Hospital, Foshan, 528315, China. hezaopeng@163.com.
Li HuangDepartment of PancreatoBiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. huangL86@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Chun-Tao YangGuangzhou Municipal and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Protein Modification and Disease, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China. cyang@gzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2024A1515010618, 2021A1515011365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer, notoriously refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Historically, sulfane sulfur-based compounds have been explored for the treatment of HCC, but their efficacy has been underwhelming. We recently reported a novel sulfane sulfur donor, PSCP, which exhibited improved chemical stability and structural malleability. This study aimed to investigate the effects of PSCP on HCC and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. We utilized bioinformatics algorithms for clustering, function enrichment, feature screening and survival analysis on proteomic data from the Cancer Proteome Atlas (CPTAC) and transcriptomic data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). The impact of PSCP on HCC was assessed in vitro and in vivo, focusing on the expression and activity of p53 and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as mitochondrial function. The molecular target of PSCP was identified using Autodock, and binding interactions were visually analyzed. Sulfur metabolism was found to be reprogrammed in HCC, with downregulation of sulfur-related pathways correlating with poor patient prognosis. PSCP treatment significantly inhibited HCC tumor growth in an allograft model, reduced cell viability and proliferation, and induced apoptosis. PSCP potently increased p53 expression and induced AMPK phosphorylation in SNU398 HCC cells. AMPK suppression diminished PSCP-induced p53 upregulation. PSCP also impaired mitochondrial function by inhibiting mitochondrial respiratory complex I, with Ndus3 likely being the target of PSCP's action. Supplementation with ATP significantly countered PSCP-induced SNU398 cell injury. Our findings suggest that the reprogramming of sulfur-related metabolic pathways is pivotal in HCC. PSCP presents as a promising therapeutic strategy by activating the AMPK-p53 signaling axis.

Indexed as

AMP-Activated Protein KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsMitochondriaTumor Suppressor Protein p53AnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceSignal TransductionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAMP-Activated Protein KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53AMPKHepatocellular carcinomaMetabolic reprogrammingMitochondrial complexp53Sulfane sulfur

Identifiers

PMID39880887
PMCPMC11779946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.