ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic cholangioscopy for surgical planning of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent clinical outcomes of multi-regimen chemotherapy included prolonged survival and a high rate of conversion to surgery in Asian patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. The ability of single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) to detect and stage extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) in intraductal lesions is becoming more important in determining the extent of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SOC in surgical planning for extrahepatic CCC. We reviewed the consecutive data of patients who received nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine-cisplatin for the management of extrahepatic CCC and underwent preoperative evaluations between June 2020 and August 2022. SOC was performed to determine the precise extent of the disease in patients with a good response to chemotherapy who were considering surgical treatment. Among the 38 patients included, 30 (79%) were diagnosed with perihilar CCC, six (16%) with distal CCC, and two (5%) with intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct. Intraductal evaluation with SOC altered disease extent defined by previous imaging findings in 14 (37%) patients. In those patients, five (36%) were changed to less extensive surgery, four (29%) to conversion surgery, four (29%) avoided surgery, and one (7%) was changed to more extensive surgery. Among the 38 included patients, 27 (71%) underwent surgery, and the accuracy of the visual impressions was 93%, as confirmed by the surgical pathology report. In conclusion, SOC examination of patients with potentially resectable extrahepatic CCC was more precise than conventional diagnostic evaluations and could help in planning surgical options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.