Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880853›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Three-dimensional diffractive acoustic tomography.

Luca Menozzi, Tri Vu, Aidan J Canning, Harshal Rawtani, Carlos Taboada, Marie Elise Abi Antoun, Chenshuo Ma, Jesse Delia, Van Tu Nguyen, Soon-Woo Cho and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Photoacoustic Fingerprinting for Robust Molecular Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Luca Menozzi *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-1051
Tri Vu *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Aidan J Canning *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Harshal RawtaniDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0681-7156
Carlos TaboadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Marie Elise Abi AntounTufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Chenshuo MaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jesse DeliaAmerican Museum of Natural History, New York City, New York, USA.
Van Tu NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-438X
Soon-Woo ChoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5019-1429
Jianing ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-8662
Theresa CharityDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2954-4709
Yirui XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Phuong TranDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jun XiaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-7835
Gregory M PalmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-8297
Tuan Vo-DinhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. tuan.vodinh@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-3326
Liping FengDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. liping.feng@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2936-7397
Junjie YaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. junjie.yao@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-706X

Funding

INNOVATIONS IN SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY TECHNOLOGYR01DK052985 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHONG, PEI · 1997 to 2025
$6.1M
DART.3-Revolutionizing Neuropsychiatric Treatment through Noninvasive, Programmable Cell-Type-Specific NeuropharmacologyR01MH135932 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael R Tadross · 2024 to 2026
$4.4M
High-resolution High-speed Photoacoustic and Ultrasound Imaging of SmallVessel Functions in Ischemic StrokeR01NS111039 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, JUNJIE · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Head-mounted Photoacoustic Imaging of Deep-brain Neural Activities in Freely Behaving AnimalsRF1NS115581 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI VERKHUSHA, VLADISLAV, YAO, JUNJIE · 2020 to 2020
$2.0M
High-Throughput Volumetric Photoacoustic Imaging of Living Vascularized OrganoidsR01EB028143 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, JUNJIE · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
3D real-time super-resolution cavitation mapping in laser lithotripsy of urinary stone diseaseR01DK139109 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael E Lipkin, Junjie Yao · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
Duke University (Duke) Pratt Beyond the Horizon Grant, DST Spark Seed Grant, Coulter Translational GrantEli Lilly and Company (Lilly) Research Award ProgramNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB028143NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK052985NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK139109NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201400015CNIMH NIH HHS R01 MH135932NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111039NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS115581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustically probing biological tissues with light or sound, photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging can provide anatomical, functional, and/or molecular information at depths far beyond the optical diffusion limit. However, most photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging systems rely on linear-array transducers with elevational focusing and are limited to two-dimensional imaging with anisotropic resolutions. Here, we present three-dimensional diffractive acoustic tomography (3D-DAT), which uses an off-the-shelf linear-array transducer with single-slit acoustic diffraction. Without jeopardizing its accessibility by general users, 3D-DAT has achieved simultaneous 3D photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging with optimal imaging performance in deep tissues, providing near-isotropic resolutions, high imaging speed, and a large field-of-view, as well as enhanced quantitative accuracy and detection sensitivity. Moreover, powered by the fast focal line volumetric reconstruction, 3D-DAT has achieved 50-fold faster reconstruction times than traditional photoacoustic imaging reconstruction. Using 3D-DAT on small animal models, we mapped the distribution of the biliverdin-binding serpin complex in glassfrogs, tracked gold nanoparticle accumulation in a mouse tumor model, imaged genetically-encoded photoswitchable tumors, and investigated polyfluoroalkyl substances exposure on developing embryos. With its enhanced imaging performance and high accessibility, 3D-DAT may find broad applications in fundamental life sciences and biomedical research.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPhotoacoustic TechniquesTomographyAcousticsAnimalsGoldMiceSerpinsTransducersUltrasonographyGoldSerpins

Identifiers

PMID39880853
PMCPMC11779832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.