ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025
Time Persistence of the FMRI Resting-State Functional Brain Networks.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Time persistence is a fundamental property of many complex physical and biological systems; thus understanding the phenomenon in the brain is of high importance. Time persistence has been explored at the level of stand-alone neural time-series, but since the brain functions as an interconnected network, it is essential to examine time persistence at the network level. Changes in resting-state networks have been previously investigated using both dynamic (i.e., examining connectivity states) and static functional connectivity (i.e., test-retest reliability), but no systematic investigation of the time persistence as a network was conducted, particularly across different timescales (i.e., seconds, minutes, dozens of seconds, days) and different brain subnetworks. Additionally, individual differences in network time persistence have not been explored. Here, we devised a new framework to estimate network time persistence at both the link (i.e., connection) and node levels. In a comprehensive series analysis of three functional MRI resting-state datasets including both sexes, we established that (1) the resting-state functional brain network becomes gradually less similar to itself for the gaps up to 23 min within the run and even less similar for the gap between the days; (2) network time persistence varies across functional networks, while the sensory networks are more persistent than nonsensory networks; (3) participants show stable individual characteristic persistence, which has a genetic component; and (4) individual characteristic persistence could be linked to behavioral performance. Overall, our detailed characterization of network time persistence sheds light on the potential role of time persistence in brain functioning and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.