Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880458›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Developing a set of key principles for care planning within older adult care homes: study protocol for a modified Delphi survey.

Jonathan Taylor, Thais Caprioli, Jacqueline Damant, Yuri Hamashima, Sarah Jasim, Nick Smith, Madalina Toma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Promoting Family/Friend Involvement in Care Planning in Care Homes: A Qualitative Exploration of the Usefulness and Relevance of an Information Resource.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan TaylorNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1790-7699
Thais CaprioliDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jacqueline DamantCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Yuri HamashimaPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-9617
Sarah JasimCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-6350
Nick SmithCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK N.J.Smith@kent.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9793-6988
Madalina TomaCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adult care homes in England are required to develop care plans on behalf of each of their residents and to make these documents available to those who provide care. However, there is a lack of formal agreement around the key principles that should inform the development of care plans in care homes for older adults. Using a modified Delphi survey, we intend to generate consensus on a set of key principles that should inform the care planning process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-stage modified Delphi survey will be used to try to reach a consensus on a set of key principles to inform care planning within older adult care homes in England. An interdisciplinary panel of approximately 50 people with experience in care planning will be convened and invited to provide feedback on a set of key principles. We will use an iterative, quasi-anonymous, multistage approach with controlled feedback. In the first round, panellists will be asked to provide feedback on a draft document whose contents have been informed by a systematic scoping review and consultations with care home staff. The first round will be administered and subsequently analysed. The results from the first round will be fed back to the panel members and panellists will be asked to complete a second survey. In each round, panel members will use a 5-point unipolar scale to rate their agreement with the item. Consensus will be considered if ≥75% of participants rate an item as 4-5. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study to which this protocol relates has been granted ethical approval by the University of Kent's Division for the Study of Law, Society and Social Justice Research Committee Ethics Panel (reference: 1006) on 9 April 2024. The results of this project will be disseminated through conferences and one or more peer-reviewed journals. In a subsequent research phase, the research team plans to share the key principles document developed through this modified Delphi survey with care home residents and their families and friends. We plan to invite their feedback through a series of focus groups with a view to developing a related document for the family and friends of care home residents.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesPatient Care PlanningAgedConsensusDelphi TechniqueEnglandHumansResearch DesignCaregiversNursing HomesPerson-Centered CareProtocols & guidelinesQuality in health careSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID39880458
PMCPMC11781119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.