Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880455›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

How does the first index mode of birth in public or private hospitals predict subsequent births? A 16-year Australian population-based linked data study.

Lilian Peters, Ank de Jonge, Michiel de Boer, Soo Downe, Hannah G Dahlen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lilian PetersDepartment of Primary and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands l.l.peters@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2342-0799
Ank de JongeDepartment of Primary and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michiel de BoerDepartment of Primary and Long-term Care, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Soo DowneWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Hannah G DahlenWestern Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-3078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this descriptive study, we aimed to assess how the index mode of birth and subsequent birth modes vary over time for public and private hospital maternity care funding models. The second aim was to determine to what extent the index mode of birth predicts subsequent birth modes in general and whether this differs in public versus private hospital maternity care funding models. With our aim, we have an innovative approach, specifically the women's life course approach, which is hypothesis-generating and can be assessed in future studies. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsNew South Wales population-linked data of low-risk women were analysed (2001-2016). Demographics and public/private care were recorded. Modes of the index birth and subsequent modes of second and third births (ie, spontaneous vaginal, instrumental vaginal elective/emergency caesarean birth) were registered. For those with 2 births and 3 births, 16 and 64 subsequent births patterns were created. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Trend of index modes of birth and subsequent modes of birth over time and the prediction of subsequent birth modes based on the index birth. These outcomes were stratified for the initial maternity care funding model.

resultsIn total, 172 041 low-risk nulliparous women were included in the initial cohort, 54.1% had a spontaneous index vaginal birth and 71% had their index birth in public hospitals. During the study period, 131 675 women had 2 births and 44 677 of these women had 3 births, respectively. Among women birthing in public hospitals, higher proportions of index and subsequent vaginal births were observed than in private hospitals, with fewer instrumental vaginal births and caesarean sections. Large differences were observed for birth patterns: vaginal-vaginal (public 55.8% vs private 36.8%) and vaginal-vaginal-vaginal (public 57.2% vs private 38.8%). Women with an index spontaneous vaginal birth showed a high probability (91.3%) of subsequent spontaneous vaginal births. When stratified by maternity care funding model, the probabilities were similar: 91.6% in public hospitals and 90.2% in private hospitals.

conclusionsOur study of low-risk Australian women (2001-2011) found that those giving birth in public hospitals had higher proportions of spontaneous vaginal births compared with private hospitals, where caesarean sections were more common. Women with an index spontaneous vaginal birth had a very high probability to have subsequent vaginal births. These findings suggest that index mode of birth may be a predictor for subsequent modes of birth.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansNew South WalesParityPregnancyYoung AdultEPIDEMIOLOGYOBSTETRICSPregnant Women

Identifiers

PMID39880455
PMCPMC11781108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.