ArticleBMJ open2025
Development and validation of a novel risk-predicted model for early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a machine learning-based prediction model for in-hospital acute kidney injury in patients with lung cancer complicated with sepsis: clinical and nursing applications.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with mortality in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Leveraging ICT Tools to Improve Kidney Health: A Comprehensive Review of Innovations in Nephrology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The cyber-physical paradigm for lifetime aortic valve management: a synthesis of robotics, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Early Identification and Risk Factors for Acute Kidney Injury Progression: A Real-World Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Stage prediction of acute kidney injury in sepsis patients using explainable machine learning approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop a prediction model for the detection of early sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI), which is defined as AKI diagnosed within 48 hours of a sepsis diagnosis.
designA retrospective study design was employed. It is not linked to a clinical trial. Data for patients with sepsis included in the development cohort were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression method was used to screen the risk factors, and the final screened risk factors were constructed into four machine learning models to determine an optimal model. External validation was performed using another single-centre intensive care unit (ICU) database.
settingData for the development cohort were obtained from the MIMIC-IV 2.0 database, which is a large publicly available database that contains information on patients admitted to the ICUs of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, from 2008 to 2019. The external validation cohort was generated from a single-centre ICU database from China.
participantsA total of 7179 critically ill patients with sepsis were included in the development cohort and 269 patients with sepsis were included in the external validation cohort.
resultsA total of 12 risk factors (age, weight, atrial fibrillation, chronic coronary syndrome, central venous pressure, urine output, temperature, lactate, pH, difference in alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure, prothrombin time and mechanical ventilation) were included in the final prediction model. The gradient boosting machine model showed the best performance, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model in the development cohort, internal validation cohort and external validation cohort were 0.794, 0.725 and 0.707, respectively. Additionally, to aid interpretation and clinical application, SHapley Additive exPlanations techniques and a web version calculation were applied.
conclusionsThis web-based clinical prediction model represents a reliable tool for predicting early SA-AKI in critically ill patients with sepsis. The model was externally validated using another ICU cohort and exhibited good predictive ability. Additional validation is needed to support the utility and implementation of this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.