Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880425›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Understanding neurocognitive recovery in older adults after total hip arthroplasty-neurocognitive assessment, blood biomarkers and patient experiences: a mixed-methods study.

Anahita Amirpour, Lina Bergman, Gabriela Markovic, Karin Liander, Ulrica Nilsson, Jeanette Eckerblad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05361460 (Patients Experiences of Early Postoperative Cognition and Its Relation to Cognitive Decline and Inflammatory Responses), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05361460 completednot on this map

Patients Experiences of Early Postoperative Cognition and Its Relation to Cognitive Decline and Inflammatory Responses: a Mixed Methods Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2019 to 2022Enrolled40ConditionsPostoperative Cognitive Decline, Biomarkers, Postoperative Recovery, Joint Replacement SurgeryArmsCognitive decline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anahita AmirpourNeurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden anahita.amirpour@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-2592
Lina BergmanNeurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7510-8679
Gabriela MarkovicDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin LianderPerioperative Medicine Intensive Care, Karolinska Universitetsjukhuset i Huddinge, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ulrica NilssonNeurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-4183
Jeanette EckerbladNeurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDelayed neurocognitive recovery, previously known as postoperative cognitive dysfunction, is a common complication affecting older adults after surgery. This study aims to address the knowledge gap in postoperative neurocognitive recovery by exploring the relationship between subjective experiences, performance-based measurements, and blood biomarkers.

designMixed-methods study with a convergent parallel (QUAL+quan) design. SETTING AND

participantsThe study reports results from 40 older adult patients (52.5% women; mean age 73, SD 6.7) scheduled for total hip arthroplasty at a hospital in Sweden. OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurocognitive performance was assessed using a standardised test battery, neuroinflammation through blood biomarker analysis and postoperative neurocognitive recovery via semistructured interviews and the Swedish Quality of Recovery questionnaire.

resultsFive patients were classified as having delayed neurocognitive recovery based on performance tests. Qualitative data revealed that most patients reported cognitive symptoms, particularly related to executive functions and fatigue. Psychological factors, including a sense of agency and low mood, significantly influenced cognitive recovery and daily functioning. Elevated inflammatory blood biomarkers were not detected pre- or postoperatively in patients with delayed neurocognitive recovery. The global postoperative recovery score was 40.9, indicating a low quality of recovery.

conclusionMany patients reported subjective cognitive decline that was not corroborated by delayed neurocognitive recovery in the performance-based tests. Psychological factors were influential for neurocognitive recovery and should be routinely assessed. Future research should incorporate longitudinal follow-ups with performance-based measurements, fatigue assessment, evaluations of instrumental activities of daily living and subjective reporting, supported by a multidisciplinary team approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05361460.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipCognitive DysfunctionPostoperative Cognitive ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCognitionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsRecovery of FunctionSwedenBiomarkersNEUROLOGYOld age psychiatryORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY

Identifiers

PMID39880425
PMCPMC11781142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.