Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880423›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial comparing intermittent cefoxitin administration versus loading bolus followed by continuous infusion for the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: the PROPHYLOXITIN study protocol.

Quentin Saint-Genis, Julien Birckener, Vincent Gourdou, Claire Nicolle, Marc Garnier, Victor Schwindenhammer, Cécile Hannezo, Christophe Aveline, Raphaël Cinotti, Benjamin Puisney and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05755789 (Intermittent Cefoxitin Administration Versus Loading Bolus Followed by Continuous Infusion for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05755789 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Intermittent Cefoxitin Administration Versus Loading Bolus Followed by Continuous Infusion for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Surgery: a Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoitiers University HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsAntibiotic Prophylaxis, Colorectal SurgeryArmsLoading bolus of cefoxitin, Intermittent cefoxitin, Continuous infusion of placebo, Continuous infusion of cefoxitin, Intermittent placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Quentin Saint-GenisUniversité de Poitiers, INSERM U1070 PHAR2, CHU de Poitiers, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Poitiers, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6420-0480
Julien BirckenerCHRU de Nancy, Nancy, France.
Vincent GourdouCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4613-522X
Claire NicolleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-1271
Marc GarnierCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5716-4239
Victor SchwindenhammerService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Cécile HannezoAnesthésie Réanimation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Christophe AvelineHôpital Privé Sévigné, Cesson Sévigné, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8464-5516
Raphaël CinottiNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimations, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation chirurgicale, Hôtel Dieu, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-centered outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-8532
Benjamin PuisneyCentre Hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France.
Matthias GarotHôpital Privé d'Arras Les Bonnettes, Arras, France.
Stéphanie ChevalierClinique Mutualiste La Sagesse Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jean-Sébastien AubertAP-HP, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6614-8361
Maxime WodeyCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Sigismond LasockiDépartement anesthésie réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Angers, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-4628
Sylvain LecoeurCentre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc, Saint-Brieuc, France.
Charles Jean LagarrigueAnesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale du Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Anne LiHospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Marion FaucherInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Yohann FoucherUniversité de Poitiers, UFR Médecine Pharmacie, CHU de Poitiers, Plateforme méthodologique, Poitiers, France.
Denis FrascaUniversité de Poitiers, UFR Médecine Pharmacie, CHU de Poitiers, Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Poitiers, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-715X
Matthieu BoissonUniversité de Poitiers, INSERM U1070 PHAR2, CHU de Poitiers, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Poitiers, France matthieu.boisson@chu-poitiers.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-5782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgical site infections (SSIs) are the second leading cause of healthcare-associated infections in Europe with the highest rates being reported in colorectal surgery (ranging from 9% to 30%). Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the most efficient measures for SSI prevention and should be started before surgical incision. Cefoxitin is an antibiotic widely used as SAP for colorectal surgery, but its continuous administration is currently the subject of debate due to its potential pharmacokinetic advantages. Therefore, the aim of the PROPHYLOXITIN study is to demonstrate that a loading dose followed by continuous infusion of cefoxitin during colorectal surgery (intervention group) decreases the rate of SSI compared to an intermittent bolus administration (control group). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PROPHYLOXITIN study is a superiority, prospective, double-blind, randomised and multicentre study of 2000 patients undergoing colorectal surgery. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of a loading dose of cefoxitin followed by continuous infusion over intermittent bolus administration in reducing the proportion of SSIs within 30 days after colorectal surgery. Subjects will be randomised 1:1 using a secure web-based random-number generator to one of two study groups. Randomised allocation of treatment will be done by minimisation and stratified according to the centre, the localisation of surgery (colon or rectum) and the type of surgical procedure (laparoscopy or laparotomy). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research has been approved by an independent ethics committee and will be carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2022-003262-20 and Clinical trial NCT05755789.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisCefoxitinColorectal SurgerySurgical Wound InfectionDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectumAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefoxitinAnti-Bacterial AgentsColorectal surgeryInfection control

Identifiers

PMID39880423
PMCPMC11781116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.