Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880416›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Starfield's 4Cs of NCD management in primary healthcare: a conceptual framework development from a case study of 19 countries.

Chuan De Foo, Krishaa Logan, Elliot Eu, Darius Erlangga, Juan Carlos Rivillas, Ewa Kosycarz, Aungsumalee Pholpark, Natchaya Ritthisirikul, Piya Hanvoravongchai, Likke Prawidya Putri and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Chuan De FooSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore ephfchu@nus.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-4881
Krishaa LoganDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Elliot EuDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Darius ErlanggaGlobal Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-356X
Juan Carlos RivillasSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ewa KosycarzSGH Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland.
Aungsumalee PholparkFaculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Natchaya RitthisirikulThailand National Health Foundation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piya HanvoravongchaiThailand National Health Foundation, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4256-1271
Likke Prawidya PutriGadjah Mada University Center for Health Policy and Management, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Tiara MarthiasNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marcela SchenckUniversidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Wilson BeniaPan American Health Organization, Washington, Washington, USA.
Eva TurkCentre for Digital Health and Social Innovation, University of Applied Sciences, St. Pölten, Austria.
Kim Bao GiangSchool of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Doan Thi Thuy DuongHanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Supri ShresthaNepal Medical College Teaching Hopsital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Maria Eugenia EsandiDepartamento de Economía, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahia Blanca, Argentina.
Laura AntoniettiUniversidad Nacional Arturo Jauretche, Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Shangzhi XiongFaculty of Medicine and Health, The George Institute for Global Health and University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pami ShresthaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Jasper TrompSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Helena Legido-QuigleySchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-005598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFaced with a backdrop of an increasing chronic disease burden from an ageing global population compounded with rising healthcare costs, health systems are required to implement cost-effective, safe and equitable care through efficient service delivery models. One approach to achieving this is through Starfield's 4Cs of primary healthcare (PHC), which delineates the key attributes of a high-performing PHC system that upholds the pillars of care coordination, first contact of care, continuity of care and comprehensive care. Therefore, this study aims to explore and elucidate the key themes and subthemes related to and extending beyond Starfield's 4Cs of PHC by integrating findings from a comprehensive literature review and a qualitative study.

methodsIn this case study analysis, case studies of PHC systems from 19 countries were purposefully selected to represent a range of income levels and diversity in health systems and PHC landscapes. A review of existing literature of peer-reviewed articles, policy documents and technical reports made publicly available data on PHC was complemented with data obtained from 61 in-depth interviews with health systems experts from a larger study. The research team thematically analysed the data and organised the key themes and subthemes into a conceptual framework that is anchored on Starfield's 4Cs of PHC.

resultsBroadly, we developed a conceptual framework with the 4Cs, placing providers and patients at the centre. The key subthemes that manifested from Starfield's 4Cs included maximising the use of existing fiscal resources, leveraging technology, improving accessibility to health services and task sharing. Other relevant and overarching themes were the deployment of national frameworks, equity, healthcare provider retention, service integration, emergency preparedness and community engagement. DISCUSSION: The subthemes derived point health systems in the right direction based on the trialled and tested PHC models of various countries. Their strong points were highlighted in our case studies to depict how Starfield's 4Cs are leveraged to strengthen PHC, and the themes we identified that went beyond the 4Cs are necessary considerations for modifying PHC policies going forward.

conclusionAs the world enters an era of ageing populations and acute system shocks, PHC needs to be fortified and integrated into the more extensive system to protect the health of the population and safeguard the well-being of providers. Our conceptual framework offers health systems a glimpse of how this can be achieved.

Indexed as

Noncommunicable DiseasesPrimary Health CareDelivery of Health CareHumansQualitative Researchglobal healthhealth policies and all other topicshealth services researchhealth systemspublic Health

Identifiers

PMID39880416
PMCPMC11781094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.