Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39880310›Full record

ReviewVirus research2025

Bridging the gap: Phage manufacturing processes from laboratory to agri-food industry.

Elham Mohammadi, Mohammadreza Rahimian, Bahman Panahi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Bacteriophages targetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  10. Isolation, characterization, andFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Eliminating the type I restriction endonuclease fromMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elham MohammadiNanoSciTec GmbH, Hermann Weinhauser str. 67, Munich 81867, Germany.
Mohammadreza RahimianDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran.
Bahman PanahiDepartment of Genomics, Branch for Northwest & West Region, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz, Iran. Electronic address: b.panahi@abrii.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in bacteriophages (phages) as sustainable biocontrol agents in the agri-food industry has increased because of growing worries about food safety and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The phage manufacturing process is examined in this review, with particular attention paid to the crucial upstream and downstream processes needed for large-scale production. Achieving large phage yields requires upstream procedures, including fermentation and phage amplification. In the meantime, downstream procedures, including purification, endotoxin removal, and formulation, is essential for guaranteeing product quality and regulatory compliance. Despite advances in upstream and downstream process optimization of phage production processes, these methods are not effectively utilized in manufacturing processes. Additionally, the commercialization of phage products is hindered by fragmented rules and inconsistent regulations. Emerging technologies such as enhanced chromatography, continuous processing, and encapsulating techniques provide prospects for increased stability, efficiency, and scalability to fill these gaps. Furthermore, by facilitating real-time process optimization, predictive quality control (QC), and unique phage product creation, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has the potential to transform the phage manufacturing industry completely. In order to provide consistent standards, encourage innovation, and bridge the gap between academic research and commercial applications, this review identifies gaps and highlights the necessity of cooperation between academia, industry, and regulatory agencies. To effectively utilize phages' potential to improve food safety, fight AMR, and promote sustainable agricultural practices, the agri-food industry must advance phage manufacturing techniques and harmonize regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesFood IndustryAgricultureBiological Control AgentsFood SafetyQuality ControlBiological Control AgentsAgriculture biocontrolAntimicrobial resistanceBacteriophagesBiocontrolDownstream processingFood safetyPhage manufacturingUpstream processing

Identifiers

PMID39880310
PMCPMC11833641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.