ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Brain Tumour Analysis: A Systematic Review of CNN-Transformer Hybrids in Multimodal Imaging.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Vascular Neurology: Applications, Challenges, and a Review of AI Tools for Stroke Imaging, Clinical Decision Making, and Outcome Prediction Models.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuroimaging segmentation is increasingly important for diagnosing and planning treatments for neurological diseases. Manual segmentation is time-consuming, apart from being prone to human error and variability. Transformers are a promising deep learning approach for automated medical image segmentation.
objectiveThis scoping review will synthesize current literature and assess the use of various transformer models for neuroimaging segmentation.
methodsA systematic search in major databases, including Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library, was carried out for studies applying transformers to neuroimaging segmentation problems from 2019 through 2023. The inclusion criteria allow only for peer-reviewed journal papers and conference papers focused on transformer-based segmentation of human brain imaging data. Excluded are the studies dealing with nonneuroimaging data or raw brain signals and electroencephalogram data. Data extraction was performed to identify key study details, including image modalities, datasets, neurological conditions, transformer models, and evaluation metrics. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach.
resultsOf the 1246 publications identified, 67 (5.38%) met the inclusion criteria. Half of all included studies were published in 2022, and more than two-thirds used transformers for segmenting brain tumors. The most common imaging modality was magnetic resonance imaging (n=59, 88.06%), while the most frequently used dataset was brain tumor segmentation dataset (n=39, 58.21%). 3D transformer models (n=42, 62.69%) were more prevalent than their 2D counterparts. The most developed were those of hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures (n=57, 85.07%), where the vision transformer is the most frequently used type of transformer (n=37, 55.22%). The most frequent evaluation metric was the Dice score (n=63, 94.03%). Studies generally reported increased segmentation accuracy and the ability to model both local and global features in brain images.
conclusionsThis review represents the recent increase in the adoption of transformers for neuroimaging segmentation, particularly for brain tumor detection. Currently, hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures achieve state-of-the-art performances on benchmark datasets over standalone models. Nevertheless, their applicability remains highly limited by high computational costs and potential overfitting on small datasets. The heavy reliance of the field on the brain tumor segmentation dataset hints at the use of a more diverse set of datasets to validate the performances of models on a variety of neurological diseases. Further research is needed to define the optimal transformer architectures and training methods for clinical applications. Continuing development may make transformers the state-of-the-art for fast, accurate, and reliable brain magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, which could lead to improved clinical tools for diagnosing and evaluating neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.