ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
SAMURAI: shallow analysis of copy number alterations using a reproducible and integrated bioinformatics pipeline.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma: the BUTTERFLY study.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Genomics and Epigenomics Approaches for the Quantification of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Relevance of a Multimodal Strategy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Baseline levels and dynamic changes of cfDNA, tumor fraction and mutations to anticipate the clinical course of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients treated with first-line atezolizumab and chemotherapy: an hypothesis generating study (CATS/ML43257).Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) offers a cost-effective approach to detect copy number alterations (CNAs). However, there remains a gap for a standardized workflow specifically designed for sWGS analysis. To address this need, in this work we present SAMURAI, a bioinformatics pipeline specifically designed for analyzing CNAs from sWGS data in a standardized and reproducible manner. SAMURAI is built using established community standards, ensuring portability, scalability, and reproducibility. The pipeline features a modular design with independent blocks for data preprocessing, copy number analysis, and customized reporting. Users can select workflows tailored for either solid or liquid biopsy analysis (e.g. circulating tumor DNA), with specific tools integrated for each sample type. The final report generated by SAMURAI provides detailed results to facilitate data interpretation and potential downstream analyses. To demonstrate its robustness, SAMURAI was validated using simulated and real-world data sets. The pipeline achieved high concordance with ground truth data and maintained consistent performance across various scenarios. By promoting standardization and offering a versatile workflow, SAMURAI empowers researchers in diverse environments to reliably analyze CNAs from sWGS data. This, in turn, holds promise for advancements in precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.