ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Within- and Between-Person Differences in Activity Factor Structure: Results From an Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensive Longitudinal Data Collection Methods in Health Research: Tutorial for Selecting Measures and Designing a Sampling Protocol.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- A continuous-time approach to short-term activity-cognition dynamics.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesStudies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of activity participation rely on items tapping domains informed by factor analyses based on single time points. Analyses from a single time point focus on differences between participants and provide little insight into how activities cluster together within a person across moments or days. The present study compared the factor structure in activity participation between- and within-persons using an expanded set of momentary activity items in middle and older adulthood.
methodsUsing tablets, 81 adults aged 41 to 94 years reported activities completed in the past 3-4 hr 5 times per day for 14 days.
resultsThe most common activities during the day involved social interactions, reading, and computer work. Watching TV or videos was the most common evening activity. Multilevel factor analysis simultaneously computed both intra-individual factors (within-person) and inter-individual factors (between-person). Four within-person and 4 between-person factors provided the best model fit, with 3 common factors: cognitive (read, computer); social (events, mentoring, providing care); and passive (TV, games). There were notable differences in the fourth factor. DISCUSSION: Although three common activity factors were found between individuals and within persons from day to day, the divergence between the fourth intra- and inter-individual factors provides insight into how activity engagement operates at different timescales and likely reflects daily demands versus long-term goals. EMA provides a window into engagement throughout and across days, but researchers who commonly use retrospective reports of between-person activity engagement may find distinctly different results from factor analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.