Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39879251›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Near-infrared spectroscopy discriminates mass-reared sterile and wild tsetse flies.

Soumaïla Pagabeleguem, Dari F Da, Bernard M Somé, Marx S P Avelessi, Nicaise D C Djègbè, Rebecca L Yoda, Abdramane Bagayogo, Hamidou Maïga, Thomas S Churcher, Roch K Dabiré

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Soumaïla PagabeleguemInstitut des Sciences de l'Environnement et du Développement Rural, Université de Dédougou (UDDG), Dédougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-5231
Dari F DaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Bernard M SoméInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Marx S P AvelessiInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Nicaise D C DjègbèInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Rebecca L YodaInstitut des Sciences de l'Environnement et du Développement Rural, Université de Dédougou (UDDG), Dédougou, Burkina Faso.
Abdramane BagayogoDirection Génnérale de l'Entomologie et de la Lutte contre les Maladies Animales à vecteurs (DGELMA), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Hamidou MaïgaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Thomas S ChurcherMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Roch K DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Direction Régionale, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring the efficacy of the sterile insect technique (SIT) programs, it is desirable to discriminate between wild and sterile tsetse males captured in monitoring traps. Currently, this is primarily achieved by marking sterile males with fluorescent dye powder before release, and identifying them using a fluorescence camera and/or microscope. However, the accuracy of this method is limited due to defective marking and wild flies contaminated with a few dye particles in the monitoring traps. Molecular techniques have been developed to discriminate doubtful flies, but they are expensive for endemic countries. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHere, we investigate the ability of a new generation monitoring tool, Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS), to discriminate between laboratory-reared Glossina palpalis gambiensis males and their field counterparts. NIRS was able to discriminate wild males from laboratory-reared males with 86% accuracy. Notably, the prediction accuracy improved to 88% when the laboratory-reared flies had been irradiated. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that NIRS can successfully identify tsetse flies even when UV camera identification is inconclusive. However, further studies are needed to expand the training dataset and include additional environmental variables before validating NIRS as a complementary method for future tsetse eradication programs.

Indexed as

EntomologyTsetse FliesAnimalsMaleSpectroscopy, Near-Infrared

Identifiers

PMID39879251
PMCPMC11809883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.