Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39879249›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Do global health networks facilitate innovation, learning and sharing? A qualitative analysis of the Quality-of-Care Network in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

Kondwani Mwandira, Seblewengel Lemma, Albert Dube, Kohenour Akter, Asebe Amenu Tufa, Agnes Kyamulabi, Gloria Seruwagi, Catherine Nakidde, Kasonde Mwaba, Nehla Djellouli and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kondwani MwandiraParent and Child Health Initiative Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-7156
Seblewengel LemmaDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, based at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Albert DubeParent and Child Health Initiative Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kohenour AkterPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-1099
Asebe Amenu TufaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Agnes KyamulabiDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Gloria SeruwagiDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine NakiddeDepartment of Social Work and Social Administration, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Kasonde MwabaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-8664
Nehla DjellouliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-2314
Charles MakwendaParent and Child Health Initiative Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-6552
Yusra Ribhi ShawarBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, United States of America.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-007644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Quality-of-Care Network (QCN), launched by WHO and partners, links global and national actors across several countries to improve maternal and newborn health. We conducted a prospective qualitative study to examine how QCN in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda facilitated learning, sharing, and innovation within and between network countries. We conducted 227 key informant interviews with QCN actors at global, national, and facility levels iteratively in two to four rounds from June 2019 to March 2022. We also reviewed all accessible QCN documents. Drawing on knowledge sharing theory, we thematically analysed the qualitative data according to three themes: sharing, learning, and innovations. Sharing and learning were evident through virtual and in-person platforms including conferences and webinars, held on online resource libraries such as the QCN website. This provides access to strategies and approaches shared by countries and actors. Locally, there was a strengthening of learning collaborative meetings, coaching, and mentorship. Regular meetings, such as stakeholder coordination meetings and learning collaborative sessions, provided opportunity for stakeholders to strategize, share and learn maternal and child health approaches. The network also promoted coordination among stakeholders. Common sharing and learning approaches, such as learning collaborative sessions, were evident across QCN countries. However, innovation was not as apparent across countries. While there were some exceptions, such as the development and adoption of innovative software applications aimed at boosting the capacity of service providers in network countries, these were limited. Most innovation approaches were similar to pre-existing maternal health approaches, adopted from an era preceding the QCN. Nevertheless, there was evidence that QCN improved their functionality. We provide evidence of how learning, sharing, and innovation among and within countries can be fostered for improving maternal and child health; and limitations. This understanding may help country efforts to achieve targets for ending preventable maternal and neonatal deaths.

Identifiers

PMID39879249
PMCPMC11778682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.