Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39879109›Full record

ArticleCancer research2025

Genomic Analysis Reveals Racial and Age-Related Differences in the Somatic Landscape of Breast Cancer and the Association with Socioeconomic Factors.

Sarah C Van Alsten, Michael I Love, Benjamin C Calhoun, Eboneé N Butler, Charles M Perou, Katherine A Hoadley, Melissa A Troester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identifying Locally Recurrent Versus Second Primary Breast Cancer: Genomic Versus Clinical Criteria from Carolina Breast Cancer Study Phase III.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah C Van AlstenLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-6939
Michael I LoveDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-0545
Benjamin C CalhounLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6505-5430
Eboneé N ButlerLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-1190
Charles M PerouLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9827-2247
Katherine A HoadleyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-1216-477X
Melissa A TroesterLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9506-6624

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BENJAMIN CARLISLE CALHOUN · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Reproduction, Lactation and Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer SubtypesP01CA151135 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI AMBROSONE, CHRISTINE B., OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2011 to 2017
$18.1M
Cancer Control Education ProgramT32CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa B Gilkey, Melissa A. Troester · 2017 to 2026
$3.7M
P53, DNA Repair Imbalance, and Immune Response in Breast Cancer Mortality DisparitiesR01CA253450 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY, Melissa A. Troester · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF) HEI-23-003National Cancer Institute (NCI) P01CA151135National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA016086National Cancer Institute (NCI) T32CA057726NCI NIH HHS P01 CA151135NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA253450NCI NIH HHS T32 CA057726Susan G. Komen (SGK) OGUNC1202U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) HT94252310235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer genomics consortia have identified somatic drivers of breast cancer subtypes. However, these studies have predominantly included older, non-Black women, and the related socioeconomic status (SES) data are limited. Increased representation and depth of social data are crucial for understanding how health inequity is intertwined with somatic landscapes. Here, we conducted targeted sequencing on primary tumors from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (N = 357; 52% Black; 47% <50) and compared the results with The Cancer Genome Atlas (N = 948; 18% Black; 27% <50). Race (Black vs. non-Black), age, and SES were evaluated in association with mutations, copy number alterations, and aneuploidy using generalized linear models. Pathway dysfunction was also assessed by aggregating mutation and copy number alterations. Adjusting for age, Black participants (N = 350) were significantly more likely to have TP53 and FAT1 mutations and less likely to have PIK3CA, CDH1, DDR2, and GATA3 mutations than non-Black participants. Younger participants had more GATA3 alterations and fewer KMT2C, PTEN, MAP3K1, and CDH1 alterations. Black participants had significant enrichment for MYC (8q) and PIK3CA (3q26) amplifications and higher total aneuploidy, but age was not associated with copy number variation. SES was associated with different patterns of alteration in Black versus non-Black women. Overall, Black participants showed modest differences in TP53, PIK3CA, and other alterations that further varied by SES. Race is a social construct, and varying distributions of etiologic factors across social strata may predispose Black, young, and low SES women to cancer subtypes characterized by these alterations. Significance: The collection and analysis of DNA sequencing with comprehensive socioeconomic factor associations in a large Black breast cancer patient cohort could help uncover mechanisms by which social conditions contribute to tumor biology.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBlack or African AmericanDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenomicsHumansMiddle AgedMutationSocioeconomic FactorsWhiteBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39879109
PMCPMC12034101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.