ArticleJAMA network open2025
Sensitivity to Environmental Stress and Adversity and Lung Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity may influence lung cancer risk, highlighting a critical link between psychosocial factors and cancer etiology. Objective: To evaluate whether genetically estimated sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity is associated with lung cancer risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were obtained from a genome-wide association study identifying 37 independent genetic variants strongly associated with sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity and a cross-ancestry genome-wide meta-analysis from the International Lung Cancer Consortium. Data were extracted between October 2023 and January 2024 and analyzed between February 2024 and June 2024. Exposures: Genetically estimated sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was lung cancer risk, and odds ratios and 95% CIs were used to assess the association between sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity with lung cancer risk. This genetic association study used a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the association between genetically estimated sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity and lung cancer risk across different histologic types. Results: Using data from 351 827 individuals from the UK Biobank and a cross-ancestry genome-wide analysis of 61 047 lung cancer cases and 947 237 controls from the International Lung Cancer Consortium, sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity was significantly associated with an increased risk of lung cancer among individuals of European ancestry (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13-1.98; P = .005) and in the cross-ancestry analysis (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85; P = .004). There were heterogeneities in the observed associations across histologic subtypes among different population ancestries. Among individuals of European ancestry, a significant association was noted among squamous cell carcinoma (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.06-2.70; P = .03). Among individuals of East Asian ancestry, an increased risk was observed for adenocarcinoma (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.00-4.18; P = .05). Associations were not observed across any of the 3 histologic subtypes among individuals of African ancestry. Conclusions and Relevance: In this genetic association study, sensitivity to environmental stress and adversity was associated with lung cancer risk. These results underscore the necessity for further research into the nuanced association between psychosocial stress and cancer risk, with a particular focus on diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.