SynthesisClinical oral investigations2025
Automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography and intraoral scans: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Transformer and generative models in dental and maxillofacial imaging: Narrative review of clinical evidence and future directions.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Review
- Effect of Fiducial Marker Design (Shape, Size, and Configuration) on the Trueness and Precision of CBCT Marker-Geometry Reproduction for CBCT-Intraoral Scan Registration: An In Vitro Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Progress of Multimodal Imaging: Bridging Orthodontics to Comprehensive Oral Multidisciplinary Care.International dental journal · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based tooth axis estimation from 3D tooth crowns using quaternion representation and multi-loss optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Dentistry: What the Evidence Supports and Which Outcomes Are Still Missing.Cureus · 2026Review
- Present and Future of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Orthodontics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A pilot study of digital technology combined with case-based learning in clinical implantology training for specialists.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Shaping Orthodontics of the Future: Concepts and Implications from a Cellular and Molecular Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Cement Remaining After Debonding and Polishing in Lingual Multibracket Appliance Using Planning Imaging 3D Software.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate recent advances in the automatic multimodal registration of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans (IOS) and their clinical significance in dentistry.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2024 across the PubMed, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, including studies that were published in the past decade. The inclusion criteria were as follows: English-language studies, randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective studies.
resultsOf the 493 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 14 studies used geometry-based methods, 7 used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and 1 compared the accuracy of both approaches. Geometry-based methods primarily utilize two-stage coarse-to-fine registration algorithms, which require relatively fewer computational resources. In contrast, AI methods leverage advanced deep learning models, achieving significant improvements in automation and robustness.
conclusionsRecent advances in CBCT and IOS registration technologies have considerably increased the efficiency and accuracy of 3D dental modelling, and these technologies show promise for application in orthodontics, implantology, and oral surgery. Geometry-based algorithms deliver reliable performance with low computational demand, whereas AI-driven approaches demonstrate significant potential for achieving fully automated and highly accurate registration. Future research should focus on challenges such as unstable registration landmarks or limited dataset diversity, to ensure their stability in complex clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39878846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.