ArticleArchives of microbiology2025
Characterization of the host specificity of the SH3 cell wall binding domain of the staphylococcal phage 88 endolysin.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative In Silico and Experimental Characterization of Endolysin LysPALS22: Structural Diversity, Ligand Binding Affinity, and Heterologous Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages produce endolysins at the end of the lytic cycle, which are crucial for lysing the host cells and releasing virion progeny. This lytic feature allows endolysins to act as effective antimicrobial alternatives when applied exogenously. Staphylococcal endolysins typically possess a modular structure with one or two enzymatically active N-terminal domains (EADs) and a C-terminal cell wall binding domain (CBD). The EADs degrade the peptidoglycan layer, leading to bacterial lysis, while the CBD binds to the specific host cell wall, and therefore, influences specificity of the endolysin. This study aimed to alter and characterize the host specificity of the CBD by exploring the impact of amino acid modifications within the CBD of a staphylococcal endolysin, Endo88. Endo88 was able to lyse Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus faecalis. However, despite attempts to mutate amino acids hypothesized for binding with cell wall components, the host-range was not affected but the lytic activity was severely reduced instead, although no alterations were performed on the EADs (Cysteine, histidine-dependent aminohydrolases/peptidases domain and Amidase domain). Further investigations of the CBD alone (Src homology3 domain, SH3) without the EADs suggested that binding and lytic activity may not be correlated in some cases since Endo88 and its mutants could lyse Staphylococcus epidermidis well but no binding activity was observed in the flow cytometry analysis. Molecular docking was used to gain insights on the observations for the binding and lytic activity which may help future strategies in designing enhanced engineered endolysins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39878790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.