ArticleJournal of cell science2025
Mitochondria-plasma membrane contact sites regulate the ER-mitochondria encounter structure.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intercompartmental communication in senescence.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Alzheimer's disease: disrupted communication between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Potassium ion homeostasis modulates mitochondrial function.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
- The power of connections: Recent advances in understanding the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics by membrane contact sites.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025Review
- Mitochondria-Plasma Membrane Contact Sites: Emerging Regulators of Mitochondrial Form and Function.Contact (Thousand Oaks (Ventura County, Calif.))Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cells form multiple, molecularly distinct membrane contact sites (MCSs) between organelles. Despite knowing the molecular identity of several of these complexes, little is known about how MCSs are coordinately regulated in space and time to promote organelle function. Here, we examined two well-characterized mitochondria-endoplasmic reticulum (ER) MCSs - the ER-mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES) and the mitochondria-ER-cortex anchor (MECA) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We report that loss of MECA results in a substantial reduction in the number of ERMES contacts. Rather than reducing ERMES protein levels, loss of MECA results in an increase in the size of ERMES contacts. Using live-cell microscopy, we demonstrate that ERMES contacts display several dynamic behaviors, such as de novo formation, fusion and fission, that are altered in the absence of MECA or by changes in growth conditions. Unexpectedly, we find that the mitochondria-plasma membrane (PM) tethering, and not the mitochondria-ER tethering, function of MECA regulates ERMES contacts. Remarkably, synthetic tethering of mitochondria to the PM in the absence of MECA is sufficient to rescue the distribution of ERMES foci. Overall, our work reveals how one MCS can influence the regulation and function of another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.