ArticlemSystems2025
Exploration of the genetic landscape of bacterial dsDNA viruses reveals an ANI gap amid extensive mosaicism.
Article in mSystems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- EvANI benchmarking workflow for evolutionary distance estimation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Deep learning-guided structural analysis of a novel bacteriophage KPP105 against multidrug-resistantComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Average nucleotide identity (ANI) is a widely used metric to estimate genetic relatedness, especially in microbial species delineation. While ANI calculation has been well optimized for bacteria and closely related viral genomes, accurate estimation of ANI below 80%, particularly in large reference data sets, has been challenging due to a lack of accurate and scalable methods. To bridge this gap, we introduce MANIAC, an efficient computational pipeline optimized for estimating ANI and alignment fraction (AF) in viral genomes with divergence around ANI of 70%. Using a rigorous simulation framework, we demonstrate MANIAC's accuracy and scalability compared to existing approaches, even to data sets of hundreds of thousands of viral genomes. Applying MANIAC to a curated data set of complete bacterial dsDNA viruses revealed a multimodal ANI distribution, with a distinct gap around 80%, akin to the bacterial ANI gap (~90%) but shifted, likely due to viral-specific evolutionary processes such as recombination dynamics and mosaicism. We then evaluated ANI and AF as predictors of genus-level taxonomy using a logistic regression model. We found that this model has strong predictive power (PR-AUC = 0.981), but that it works much better for virulent (PR-AUC = 0.997) than temperate (PR-AUC = 0.847) bacterial viruses. This highlights the complexity of taxonomic classification in temperate phages, known for their extensive mosaicism, and cautions against over-reliance on ANI in such cases. MANIAC can be accessed at https://github.com/bioinf-mcb/MANIAC.IMPORTANCEWe introduce a novel computational pipeline called MANIAC, designed to accurately assess average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF) between diverse viral genomes, scalable to data sets of over 100k genomes. Using computer simulations and real data analyses, we show that MANIAC could accurately estimate genetic relatedness between pairs of viral genomes of around 60%-70% ANI. We applied MANIAC to investigate the question of ANI discontinuity in bacterial dsDNA viruses, finding evidence for an ANI gap, akin to the one seen in bacteria but around ANI of 80%. We then assessed the ability of ANI and AF to predict taxonomic genus boundaries, finding its strong predictive power in virulent, but not in temperate phages. Our results suggest that bacterial dsDNA viruses may exhibit an ANI threshold (on average around 80%) above which recombination helps maintain population cohesiveness, as previously argued in bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.