Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878492›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025

Population pharmacokinetics and pulmonary modeling of eravacycline and the determination of microbiological breakpoint and cutoff of PK/PD.

Xi-Wei Ji, Wen Yao Mak, Feng Xue, Wen-Yu Yang, Isabelle Hui-San Kuan, Xiao-Qiang Xiang, Yun Li, Xiao Zhu

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Eravacycline: From broad-spectrum coverage to novel clinical applications.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xi-Wei Ji *Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wen Yao Mak *Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-2934
Feng XueInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wen-Yu YangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Isabelle Hui-San KuanMomentum Metrix, San Francisco, California, USA.
Xiao-Qiang XiangDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yun LiInstitute of Clinical Pharmacology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1173-1282
Xiao ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3295-619X

Funding

Fudan University () Scientific Research Foundation for Talented Scholars (JIF301052)Shanghai Municipal Health Commision Clinical Research Youth Project 2022Y0121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eravacycline is a broad-spectrum fluorocycline currently approved for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). In lung-infection models, it is effective against methicillin-resistant

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsLungTetracyclinesAcinetobacter baumanniiAdultEscherichia coliFemaleHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentseravacyclineTetracyclineseravacyclinePK/PDpopulation pharmacokineticspulmonary distribution

Identifiers

PMID39878492
PMCPMC11881576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.