ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2025
Vascular Healing After Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Chronic Total Occlusions.
Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiodegradable polymer stents may reduce the risk of neoatherosclerosis and stent thrombosis. Limited data is available for biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (BP-SES) and durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-EES) in chronic total occlusions (CTO).
aimThis study was to evaluate healing patterns of BP-SES versus DP-EES in CTO at 3 and 13 months based on optical coherence tomography (OCT).
methodsThe TARGET-CTO study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized noninferiority controlled trial for BP-SES compared to DP-EES in CTO. In the current predefined subanalysis, 44 consecutive patients underwent OCT follow-up at 3 and 13 months. The primary endpoint was mean neo-intimal thickness at 3 months.
resultsAt 3 months, mean neo-intimal thickness was 47.6 ± 15.7 µm in BP-SES and 62.5 ± 37.3 µm in DP-EES (p = 0.384), meeting the noninferiority for BP-SES (p
conclusionsBP-SES was noninferior to DP-EES in terms of neo-intimal thickness at 3 months and healing responses at 3-month follow-up were comparable. At 13 months, less advanced neoatherosclerosis patterns were observed in BP-SES as compared to DP-EES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.