Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878357›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025

Prehabilitation of Patients With Oesophageal Malignancy Undergoing Peri-Operative Treatment (Pre-EMPT): Outcomes From a Prospective Controlled Trial.

R Bott, J Zylstra, W Knight, G P Whyte, A M Lane, C Moss, M Browning, J Lagergren, M Van Hemelrijck, A R Davies and 1 more

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health-related quality of life in esophageal cancer: a state-of-the-art review of patient-reported outcomes and an evidence and gap map.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

R BottDepartment of Upper GI and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2030-2236
J ZylstraDepartment of Upper GI and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
W KnightDepartment of Upper GI and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
G P WhyteSport and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
A M LaneUniversity of Wolverhampton Research Centre for Sport, Exercise and Performance (RCSEP), Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
C MossSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
M BrowningDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, United Kingdom.
J LagergrenDepartment of Upper GI and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
M Van HemelrijckSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
A R DaviesDepartment of Upper GI and General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Pre‐EMPT study group including the following co‐authors

Funding

This study was supported by Guy's and St Thomas' Charity.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pre-EMPT study aimed to determine if structured exercise could reduce length of stay, post-operative complications and improve fitness and health-related quality of life (HQRL) in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and oesophagectomy.

methodsA prospective non-randomised trial compared a standard care pathway (control) to a structured prehabilitation exercise programme (intervention) commenced before NAC and surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Length of hospital stay and post-operative complications were recorded. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPEX), body composition analyses, lymphocyte levels and HRQL questionnaires were performed at multiple time points.

resultsMedian length of stay was similar in both groups. There were 6 versus 11 complications observed (intervention vs control p = 0.086). Cardio-pulmonary fitness (VO2peak) declined after NAC, but less in the intervention group (intervention -13.54% vs control -21.40%, p = 0.02). Body composition improved in the intervention group (FMi/FFMi -5.5% intervention, 10.7% control p = 0.043). Performance, cognitive, sleep and emotional function scores improved following NAC in the intervention group. Lymphocyte subsets increased in the intervention group compared to the control group after chemotherapy (p = 0.034). Chemotherapy response was improved in the intervention group (p = 0.022).

conclusionA structured exercise programme may mitigate cardiopulmonary deconditioning, reduce sarcopenia and offset lymphopenia, during chemotherapy, in patients undergoing NAC and oesophagectomy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyExercise TherapyPerioperative CarePreoperative ExerciseAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of Lifecardiopulmonary exercise testinghealth‐related quality of lifeneoadjuvant chemotherapyoesophageal adenocarcinomaprehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39878357
PMCPMC12232078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.