Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878216›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2025

Measuring XNA polymerase fidelity in a hydrogel particle format.

Esau L Medina, John C Chaput

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Esau L MedinaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3958, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1379-0801
John C ChaputDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-3958, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1393-135X

Funding

University of California, Irvine
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growth in the development of engineered polymerases for synthetic biology has led to renewed interest in assays that can measure the fidelity of polymerases that are capable of synthesizing artificial genetic polymers (XNAs). Conventional approaches require purifying the XNA intermediate of a replication cycle (DNA → XNA → DNA) by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, which is a slow, costly, and inefficient process that requires a large-scale transcription reaction and careful extraction of the XNA strand from the gel slice. In an effort to streamline the assay, we developed a purification-free approach in which the XNA transcription and reverse transcription steps occur inside the matrix of a hydrogel-coated magnetic particle. Accordingly, a DNA primer cross-linked throughout the gel matrix is annealed to a template of defined sequence and extended with XNA. Following removal of the DNA template, the XNA product strand is copied back into DNA, recovered, amplified, cloned, and sequenced. Performing the replication cycle in the hydrogel format drastically reduces the time and reaction scales required to measure the fidelity of an XNA polymerase, making it easier to evaluate the properties of a range of candidate XNA polymerases.

Indexed as

DNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseHydrogelsPolymersDNADNA ReplicationSynthetic BiologyTranscription, GeneticDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseHydrogelsPolymers

Identifiers

PMID39878216
PMCPMC11775589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.