Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878207›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Frontopolar Cortex Interacts With Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Causally Guide Metacognition.

Georgia E Kapetaniou, Marius Moisa, Christian C Ruff, Philippe N Tobler, Alexander Soutschek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Network-oriented neurorehabilitation after stroke: a paradigmatic approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgia E KapetaniouDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marius MoisaDepartment of Economics, Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christian C RuffDepartment of Economics, Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philippe N ToblerDepartment of Economics, Zurich Center for Neuroeconomics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alexander SoutschekDepartment of Psychology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8438-7721

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim StiftungDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SO 1636/2-1European Research Council 725355Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 100014_165884Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 100019_176016Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10001C_188878Universität Zürich
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate metacognitive judgments about an individual's performance in a mental task require the brain to have access to representations of the quality and difficulty of first-order cognitive processes. However, little is known about how accurate metacognitive judgments are implemented in the brain. Here, we combine brain stimulation with functional neuroimaging to determine the neural and psychological mechanisms underlying the frontopolar cortex's (FPC) role in metacognition. Specifically, we evaluate two-layer neural architectures positing that FPC enables metacognitive judgments by communicating with brain regions encoding first-order decision difficulty. In support of two-layer architectures of metacognition, we found that high-intensity transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS; 4 mA peak-to-peak) over FPC impaired metacognitive accuracy; at the neural level, this impairment was reflected by reduced coupling between FPC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), particularly during difficult metacognitive judgments. We also evaluated conceptual accounts assuming that metacognition relies on self-directed mentalizing. However, we observed no influence of FPC tACS on mentalizing performance and only a weak overlap of the networks underlying metacognition and mentalizing. Together, our findings put the FPC at the center of a two-layer architecture that enables accurate evaluations of cognitive processes, mainly via the FPC's connectivity with regions encoding first-level task difficulty, with little contributions from mentalizing-related processes.

Indexed as

ConnectomeDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFrontal LobeMentalizationMetacognitionNerve NetPrefrontal CortexTheory of MindAdultFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansJudgmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTranscranial Direct Current Stimulationfrontal poleintertemporal choicemetacognitive accuracytheta oscillationsuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39878207
PMCPMC11775761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.