Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878168›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2025

Retinal oculomics and risk of incident aortic aneurysm and aortic adverse events: a population-based cohort study.

Cong Li, Yu Huang, Jian Chen, Guangyao Hua, Fan Yang, Dongqin Cai, Yu Kuang, Xue He, Yan Wang, Jianrong Jiang and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Cong LiSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yu HuangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academic of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangyao HuaDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academic of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fan YangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Dongqin CaiSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yu KuangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xue HeSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yan WangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Jianrong JiangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenchao DuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingyan PengGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Heng LiGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhishen PengGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tengda HuangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Yun RenGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenli ZhangGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lei LiuGuangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Danli ShiSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
Jianfang LuoSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Honghua YuSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaohong YangSchool of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe asymptomatic onset and extremely high mortality rate of aortic aneurysm (AA) highlight the urgency of early detection and timely intervention. The alteration of retinal vascular features (RVFs) can reflect the systemic vascular properties, and be widely used as the biomarker for cardiovascular disease risk prediction. Therefore, we aimed to investigate associations of RVFs with AA and its progression.

methodsIn this prospective population-based cohort study, participants with eligible fundus images and without a history of AA at recruitment were included for analysis. A fully automated Retina-based Microvascular Health Assessment System was used to quantify multidimensional RVFs including the branching angle, caliber, complexity, density, length, and tortuosity. Univariable and multivariable Cox regressions were used to estimate the association of RVFs with the incidence of AA and aortic adverse events (AAE). Furthermore, propensity score matching was performed to mitigate the confounding effects of baseline characteristics.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 11.0 years, 306 incident AA (164 with abdominal AA and 108 with thoracic AA) and 48 incident AAE were documented. In the fully adjusted model, the retinal arterial branching angle (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 0.99) and the central tendency and variability of minimum venular caliber were significantly associated with the risk of incident AA (HR 1.13-1.15), while the venular minimum angular asymmetry (0.48, 0.30 to 0.77) was significantly associated with the incidence of AAE. Moreover, specific alterations of RVFs were observed in different AA subtypes (caliber in abdominal AA [HR 1.21]; caliber [HR 1.21-1.28], complexity, length, and tortuosity [HR 0.77-0.82] in thoracic AA). Similar results were obtained after propensity score-matched analysis, confirming the stability of these associations.

conclusionsWe identified a significant association of certain RVFs with incident AA and AAE, implying that noninvasive, and convenient fundus photography could be a promising tool to facilitate the early detection of AA and subsequent preventative interventions.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalAortic Aneurysm, ThoracicRetinal VesselsAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39878168
PMCPMC12372746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.