Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Kailey M McCainGlobal Enviornmental and Genomic Health Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1208-801X
Gabby MansillaGlobal Enviornmental and Genomic Health Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Elizabeth L SheldonSorbonne Université, Villefranche Oceanography Laboratory, 181 Chem. du Lazaret, Villefranche-sur-Mer 06230, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5002-3006
Cedric ZimmerLaboratoire d'Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée, LEEC, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, UR 4443, Villetaneuse 93430, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8160-2836
Aaron W SchreyDepartment of Biology, Georgia Southern University Armstrong Campus, Science Center 1505,16 11935 Abercorn Street, Savannah, GA 31419, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2165-7349
Melissah RoweDepartment of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen 6700 AB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-041X
Roi DorDepartment of Natural Sciences, The Open University of Israel, Ra'anana, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8743-9387
Kevin D KohlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 4249 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1126-2949
Jørgen S SørakerDepartment of Biology, Centre for Conservation Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8146-4576
Henrik JensenDepartment of Biology, Centre for Conservation Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.
Kimberley J MathotCanada Research Chair in Integrative Ecology, Department of Biological Sciences,CW405 Biological Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-1369
Thinh VuDepartment of Wildlife, Faculty of Forest Resource and Environmental Management, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Chương Mỹ, Vietnam.
Ho Thu PhuongDepartment of Wildlife, Faculty of Forest Resource and Environmental Management, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Chương Mỹ, Vietnam.
Blanca JimenoDepartment of Biological Conservation and Ecosystem Restoration, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC). Av. Nuestra Señora de la Victoria, 22700, Jaca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-0163
Katherine L BuchananSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University Geelong, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-5819
Massamba ThiamLaboratory of Zoology of Terrestrial Vertebrates, Fundamental Institute of Black Africa,Cheikh Anta Diop University of Dakar Senegal, Dakar, Senegal.
James BriskieSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5813-4392
Lynn B MartinGlobal Enviornmental and Genomic Health Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-4937
Funding
National Science Foundation 2027040Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Honor Society G20230315-5001
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
The success of introduced species often relies on flexible traits, including immune system traits. While theories predict non-natives will have weak defences due to decreased parasite pressure, effective parasite surveillance remains crucial, as infection risk is rarely zero and the evolutionary novelty of infection is elevated in non-native areas. This study examines the relationship between parasite surveillance and cytokine responsiveness in native and non-native house sparrows, hypothesizing that non-natives maintain high pathogen surveillance while avoiding costly inflammation. We made this specific prediction, as this pattern could enable invaders to effectively mitigate pathogen risk in a manner commensurate with the life-history priorities of a colonizing organism (i.e. rapid maturation and high reproductive effort). To test this hypothesis, we measured
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Microbial surveillance versus cytokine responsiveness in native and non-native house sparrows. · full record | OpenQuestion