Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39878124›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

High failure rate in meniscal repair when preceding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An analysis of two-stage surgery for concomitant ACL injury and traumatic meniscus tear.

Adolfo López Personat, Riccardo Cristiani, Anders Stålman, Johan Wänman, Christoffer Von Essen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adolfo López PersonatDepartment of Orthopedics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5642-483X
Riccardo CristianiCapio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3286-4060
Anders StålmanCapio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-2024
Johan WänmanDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences (Orthopedics), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4874-6800
Christoffer Von EssenCapio Artro Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Sophiahemmet Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6871-3267

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the failure rate, predictive factors associated with failure and clinical outcomes after a two-stage surgery; meniscus repair followed by subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsPatients with a concomitant traumatic meniscus tear and ACL injury who underwent a two-stage surgery between January 2015 and January 2021 were identified. The primary outcome was meniscal repair failure, defined as a reoperation (re-repair or resection). A Cox-regression analysis was used in order to analyse factors associated with meniscal repair failure within 3 years after the primary surgery for a meniscal repair. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM), anterior knee laxity and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1- and 2-year follow-up. The thresholds of patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), treatment failure (TF) and minimum important change (MIC) were applied to KOOS4 (mean score of the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Sports/Rec and QoL subscales).

resultsA total of 150 patients were included. The meniscal repair failure rate after 3 years was 36.7%. Failure of meniscal repair was significantly associated with a time interval >1 year between the meniscal repair to the ACLR (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2-5.5; p < 0.01), medial meniscus repair (HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6-3.4; P < 0.01), and female sex (HR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.0-1.9; p = 0.01). The age of the patient was not associated with meniscal repair failure. At the 6-month follow-up, most patients (72.5%) showed less than 2 mm of knee laxity; four patients (6.7%) experienced loss of extension and four patients (1.7%) experienced loss of flexion. On the KOOS4, at the 2-year follow-up, PASS was achieved in 53.4%, TF occurred in 1.7%, and MIC was reached in 36.4% of patients.

conclusionThe meniscus repair failure rate after the staged procedure was 36.7% at 3 years. A longer time interval from meniscal repair to ACLR, medial meniscus repair, and female sex were associated with an increased risk of meniscal repair failure. Age was not associated with meniscal repair failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series retrospective study.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTibial Meniscus InjuriesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment FailureYoung AdultACL reconstructionknee functionmeniscus failuremeniscus repairstaged

Identifiers

PMID39878124
PMCPMC12205414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.